Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorRobins, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-22T23:40:01Z
dc.date.available2021-05-22T23:40:01Z
dc.date.issued2019-08
dc.identifier257443819
dc.identifierb7bbf178-4b15-4731-87c9-e6a20d6c2a8b
dc.identifier85066901427
dc.identifier000478070500007
dc.identifier.citationRobins , D 2019 , ' Lifestyle migration from the Global South to the Global North : individualism, social class, and freedom in a centre of "superdiversity" ' , Population, Space and Place , vol. 25 , no. 6 , e2236 . https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2236en
dc.identifier.issn1544-8444
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/23231
dc.descriptionFunding: St Andrews’ Janet T Anderson Scholarship.en
dc.description.abstractLifestyle migration is a growing field of interest. Traditionally, research into lifestyle migration has focused on either “North to North” or “North to South” migration. This article analyses middle‐class Brazilian migration to London together with examples from the lifestyle migration literature to argue that there are instances of movement from the Global South to the Global North, which should be classified as lifestyle migration according to how the term is used in the literature. This is important because there is a tendency in migration studies to implicitly classify all voluntary migration from South to North as “economic.” The article compares the similarities in terms of motivations to migrate and identity as a migrant, between “lifestyle migrants” as characterised in the literature and many Brazilian middle‐class migrants to London. Rather than economic gain, individualist ideals of anonymity and mobility are often central in the discourse. Mobility is conceived not only as mobility across space but also in terms of mobility of identity, specifically as a disavowal of a transnational identity in favour of a more individualistic ideological stance. The article goes on to examine how the dichotomy between lifestyle and economic migrants is operationalised within the discourse of middle‐class Brazilian migrants to demarcate their situation from their “transnational” compatriots who they view as “other.” This act of distancing themselves from the “typical migrant” and often from Brazilian “culture” more generally is often stratified by class and race. Distancing becomes especially important in cases when differences may not be so apparent to an outside observer. The article ultimately argues for an understanding of lifestyle migration that incorporates movements from South to North and thus for a greater emphasis on social class, which, in the context of Brazil, is bound up with issues of racial and ethnic identity.
dc.format.extent421368
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPopulation, Space and Placeen
dc.subjectBrazilen
dc.subjectClassen
dc.subjectLifestyleen
dc.subjectLondonen
dc.subjectMigrationen
dc.subjectSocialen
dc.subjectJV Colonies and colonization. Emigration and immigration. International migrationen
dc.subjectG Geography (General)en
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subjectSDG 10 - Reduced Inequalitiesen
dc.subject.lccJVen
dc.subject.lccG1en
dc.titleLifestyle migration from the Global South to the Global North : individualism, social class, and freedom in a centre of "superdiversity"en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Geography & Sustainable Developmenten
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/psp.2236
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2021-05-23


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record