Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBrown, Jessica
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-04T16:30:02Z
dc.date.available2021-05-04T16:30:02Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-23
dc.identifier273469459
dc.identifier42863fd4-f5d8-47bd-8291-90bec8502684
dc.identifier000646286800001
dc.identifier85105055460
dc.identifier.citationBrown , J 2022 , ' Group motivation ' , Noûs , vol. 56 , no. 2 , 12366 , pp. 494-510 . https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12366en
dc.identifier.issn0029-4624
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-1149-4814/work/93515203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/23113
dc.descriptionThis is part of a project on group responsibility funded by the Leverhulme Trust.en
dc.description.abstractIn this paper I discuss a key issue for group moral responsibility, namely whether we can make sense of a group acting for one reason rather than another. The notion of acting for one reason rather than another is central to standard accounts of individual agency and responsibility; and also determines whether an individual is blameworthy or praiseworthy for an action. Thus if we model group responsibility on individual responsibility, we need to be able to make sense of a group acting for one reason rather than another. In this paper, I raise problems for both summative and inflationary accounts of what it is for a group to act on a reason, before suggesting several potential solutions at the end.
dc.format.extent17
dc.format.extent149021
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofNoûsen
dc.subjectBF Psychologyen
dc.subjectBJ Ethicsen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccBFen
dc.subject.lccBJen
dc.titleGroup motivationen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.sponsorThe Leverhulme Trusten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Philosophyen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/nous.12366
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.grantnumberen


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record