Between a rock and a hard place : comparing arms' length bodies for public involvement in healthcare across the UK
Abstract
Arms' length bodies are often seen as a tool of technocratic governance, designed to insulate decision-making from the politicizing pressures of populist influence. This article examines a subset of arms' length bodies in the UK which challenge this convention: agencies which exist to 'champion' the voice of patients and the public in the four NHS systems (England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales). We compare the functions of these agencies on paper and through qualitative interviews in each system which focused on public involvement in major service change (such as closing hospitals). We found that agencies in all four systems had struggled to demonstrate their legitimacy, squeezed between the demands of the elected Governments they answer to, the NHS organisations they are meant to support and challenge, and the publics whose voices they are meant to amplify. We argue that the evolving solutions found in each system demonstrate a foundational tension between locally-legitimate actors and nationally-capable political savvy.
Citation
Stewart , E , Ercia , A , Greer , S L & Donnelly , P D 2020 , ' Between a rock and a hard place : comparing arms' length bodies for public involvement in healthcare across the UK ' , Health Policy , vol. 124 , no. 4 , pp. 454-461 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.02.004 , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.02.004
Publication
Health Policy
Status
Peer reviewed
ISSN
0168-8510Type
Journal article
Description
This study was funded by the Health Foundation under the Policy Challenge Fund. Thanks to all our research participants for sharing their time and views.Collections
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Narrowing mortality gap between men and women over two decades : a registry-based study in Ontario, Canada
Rosella, Laura C; Calzavara, Andrew; Frank, John W; Fitzpatrick, Tiffany; Donnelly, Peter D; Henry, David (2016-11-14) - Journal articleBackground: Historically, women have lower all-cause mortality than men. It is less understood that sex differences have been converging, particularly among certain subgroups and causes. This has implications for public ... -
BETTER HEALTH : Durham -- protocol for a cluster randomized trial of BETTER in community and public health settings
Paszat, Lawrence; Sutradhar, Rinku; O'Brien, Mary Ann; Lofters, Aisha; Pinto, Andrew; Selby, Peter; Baxter, Nancy; Donnelly, Peter D; Elliott, Regina; Glazier, Richard H; Kyle, Robert; Manca, Donna; Pietrusiak, Mary-Anne; Rabeneck, Linda; Sopcak, Nicolette; Tinmouth, Jill; Wall, Becky; Grunfeld, Eva (2017-09-29) - Journal articleBackground: The Building on Existing Tools to Improve Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening (BETTER) cluster randomized trial in primary care settings demonstrated a 30% improvement in adherence to evidence-based Chronic ... -
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 7 : understanding the potential impacts of dissemination bias
Booth, Andrew; Lewin, Simon; Glenton, Claire; Munthe-Kaas, Heather; Toews, Ingrid; Noyes, Jane; Rashidian, Arash; Berg, Rigmor C.; Nyakang'o, Brenda; Meerpohl, Joerg J.; GRADE-CERQual Coordinating Team (2018-01-25) - Journal articleBackground: The GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach has been developed by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) Working Group. The ...