Bull, bear, or rat markets : rat "stock market" task reveals human-like behavioral biases
MetadataShow full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Altmetrics DOI Statistics
Investors often exhibit behavioral biases (e.g., loss aversion) that are putatively underpinned by mechanisms supporting reinforcement learning in the brain, which are largely evolutionarily conserved across mammalian species. Although previous research has demonstrated that rats, similar to humans, exhibit behavioral economic biases in certain contexts, asset market contingencies have gone largely unexplored. Thus, we developed an experimental “stock market”’ task in which cohorts of 4 rats drove asset prices up and down by selecting and subsequently buying, selling, or holding “stocks” to earn sweet liquid reward. Profits and losses were operationalized as reward volumes larger than and smaller than a reference volume of reward, respectively. Following a loss, rats moved more slowly to collect the reward and spent less time licking at the reward spigot, indicative of lower motivation to approach and “savor” a loss reward. Rats also tended to respond suboptimally following a loss, which corresponded to an increase in risk-seeking behavior characterized by a bias against the optimal “hold” option in that context. Rats’ choice of the sell option demonstrated a robust tendency toward realizing gains more quickly than losses, which is characteristic of the “disposition effect” in human stock markets. Our results indicate that rats exhibit behavioral biases similar to human investors, emphasizing the suitability of the rat stock market model to future work into the behavioral neuroscience of suboptimal financial decision-making.
Huttunen , A , Reeve , H & Bowman , E 2020 , ' Bull, bear, or rat markets : rat "stock market" task reveals human-like behavioral biases ' , Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics , vol. 13 , no. 4 , pp. 204-229 . https://doi.org/10.1037/npe0000133
Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics
Copyright © 2020 American Psychological Association. This work has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies or with permission. Permission for further reuse of this content should be sought from the publisher or the rights holder. This is the author created accepted manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1037/npe0000133
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.