Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorSchlegel, Isabelle
dc.contributor.authorOzakinci, Gozde
dc.contributor.authorCarstairs, Sharon A
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-24T10:30:02Z
dc.date.available2021-03-24T10:30:02Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-23
dc.identifier273385652
dc.identifier2fa27259-ee6b-488e-926c-28142bbf1a48
dc.identifier85103195748
dc.identifier000700948300002
dc.identifier.citationSchlegel , I , Ozakinci , G & Carstairs , S A 2021 , ' The influence of supraliminal priming on energy density of food selection : a randomised controlled trial ' , BMC Psychology , vol. 9 , 48 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-021-00554-1en
dc.identifier.issn2050-7283
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-5869-3274/work/91340874
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-6593-5972/work/91341033
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/21696
dc.descriptionFunding: This research was funded by the University of St Andrews and did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.en
dc.description.abstractBackground: Many people exercise because they know it is good for their health. Although this is true, it can make us feel deserving of a reward and lead us to eat more indulgent, less healthy food than if we had not done any exercise. Generally, lower energy-dense (LED) foods are recognised as healthier choices than higher energy-dense (HED) options. Despite our intention to make healthy choices, seeing tempting higher-calorie foods on offer often side-tracks us. Priming is a psychological tool that makes specific changes to our environment that remind us of our motivation to be healthy. This makes it easier to choose a healthier option, by nudging us towards it without us even realising. However, it is currently unclear which method of priming achieves the best results. Aims: Our study explores whether priming people to expect they will receive LED food leads them to make this healthier choice after exercise, even when also offered tempting less healthy HED foods at the moment of selection. Methods: Our study observed the foods selected by university athletes after their sports matches. Before the match, half of the participants were primed by asking them to choose a LED snack from the options we offered, which they would receive after the match. The remaining half of participants were not asked this same question. To distract the athletes from our observation of their food choices, participants completed a task prior to choosing their snack, which was disguised as a ‘thank you’ for taking part. Results: Overall, we found the priming group did not choose LED foods significantly more than the control group, hence priming did not increase LED food selection. Conclusion: Importantly, our results indicate that priming must be more noticeable to achieve its goal. Additionally, we demonstrated that priming may be less successful for young athletic individuals, compared to older and more overweight adults recruited in other studies. This highlights the importance of studying a broader demographic range of individuals from the general population. We support future research into this area, which will help us to tweak priming to achieve the best outcomes.
dc.format.extent9
dc.format.extent1175153
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Psychologyen
dc.subjectCompensatory eatingen
dc.subjectEnergy densityen
dc.subjectExerciseen
dc.subjectPrimingen
dc.subjectVisual cluesen
dc.subjectRA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicineen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingen
dc.subject.lccRA0421en
dc.titleThe influence of supraliminal priming on energy density of food selection : a randomised controlled trialen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Population and Behavioural Science Divisionen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Health Psychologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. St Andrews Sustainability Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s40359-021-00554-1
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record