Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorWiberg, Ralf Axel Wilhelm
dc.contributor.authorVeltsos, Paris
dc.contributor.authorSnook, Rhonda
dc.contributor.authorRitchie, Michael Gordon
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-23T11:30:04Z
dc.date.available2021-03-23T11:30:04Z
dc.date.issued2021-06
dc.identifier272933051
dc.identifier38eeee69-8250-4fce-abbf-255bb268cba1
dc.identifier85102831409
dc.identifier000631278800001
dc.identifier.citationWiberg , R A W , Veltsos , P , Snook , R & Ritchie , M G 2021 , ' Experimental evolution supports signatures of sexual selection in genomic divergence ' , Evolution Letters , vol. 5 , no. 3 , 220 , pp. 214-229 . https://doi.org/10.1002/evl3.220en
dc.identifier.issn2056-3744
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-7913-8675/work/91340872
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/21688
dc.descriptionFunding: Wellcome (Grant Number(s): 105621/Z/14/Z), Natural Environment Research Council (Grant Number(s): NBAF654, NE/I014632/1, NE/L501852/1).en
dc.description.abstractComparative genomics has contributed to the growing evidence that sexual selection is an important component of evolutionary divergence and speciation. Divergence by sexual selection is implicated in faster rates of divergence of the X chromosome and of genes thought to underlie sexually selected traits, including genes that are sex biased in expression. However, accurately inferring the relative importance of complex and interacting forms of natural selection, demography, and neutral processes that occurred in the evolutionary past is challenging. Experimental evolution provides an opportunity to apply controlled treatments for multiple generations and examine the consequent genomic divergence. Here, we altered sexual selection intensity, elevating sexual selection in polyandrous lines and eliminating it in monogamous lines, and examined patterns of allele frequency divergence in the genome of Drosophila pseudoobscura after more than 160 generations of experimental evolution. Divergence is not uniform across the genome but concentrated in “islands,” many of which contain candidate genes implicated in mating behaviors and other sexually selected phenotypes. These are more often seen on the X chromosome, which also shows greater divergence in FST than neutral expectations. There are characteristic signatures of selection seen in these regions, with lower diversity on the X chromosome than the autosomes, and differences in diversity on the autosomes between selection regimes. Reduced Tajima's D within some of the divergent regions may imply that selective sweeps have occurred, despite considerable recombination. These changes are associated with both differential gene expression between the lines and sex‐biased gene expression within the lines. Our results are very similar to those thought to implicate sexual selection in divergence between species and natural populations, and hence provide experimental support for the likely role of sexual selection in driving such types of genetic divergence, but also illustrate how variable outcomes can be for different genomic regions.
dc.format.extent16
dc.format.extent1314190
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEvolution Lettersen
dc.subjectExperimental evolutionen
dc.subjectSexual selectionen
dc.subjectGenomic divergenceen
dc.subjectDrosophila pseudoobscuraen
dc.subjectFSTen
dc.subjectTajima’s D, Genomic Islandsen
dc.subjectX chromosome divergenceen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectQH426 Geneticsen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.subject.lccQH426en
dc.titleExperimental evolution supports signatures of sexual selection in genomic divergenceen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.sponsorThe Wellcome Trusten
dc.contributor.sponsorNERCen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Biological Diversityen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciencesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. St Andrews Bioinformatics Uniten
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/evl3.220
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.grantnumber105621/Z/14/Zen
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/I014632/1en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record