Social research design : framework for integrating philosophical and practical elements
MetadataShow full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Altmetrics DOI Statistics
Aim To provide and elucidate a comprehensible framework for the design of social research. Background An abundance of information exists concerning the process of designing social research. The overall message that can be gleaned is that numerable elements - both philosophical (ontological and epistemological assumptions and theoretical perspective) and practical (issue to be addressed, purpose, aims and research questions) - are influential in the process of selecting a research methodology and methods, and that these elements and their inter-relationships must be considered and explicated to ensure a coherent research design that enables well-founded and meaningful conclusions. There is a lack of guidance concerning the integration of practical and philosophical elements, hindering their consideration and explication. Data sources The author's PhD research into loneliness and cancer. Review methods This is a methodology paper. Discussion A guiding framework that incorporates all of the philosophical and practical elements influential in social research design is presented. The chronological and informative relationships between the elements are discussed. Conclusion The framework presented can be used by social researchers to consider and explicate the practical and philosophical elements influential in the selection of a methodology and methods. Implications for practice/research It is hoped that the framework presented will aid social researchers with the design and the explication of the design of their research, thereby enhancing the credibility of their projects and enabling their research to establish well-founded and meaningful conclusions.
Cunningham , K 2014 , ' Social research design : framework for integrating philosophical and practical elements ' , Nurse Researcher , vol. 22 , no. 1 , pp. 32-37 . https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.1.32.e1276
Copyright © 2014 RCNi. This work has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies or with permission. Permission for further reuse of this content should be sought from the publisher or the rights holder. This is the author created accepted manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.1.32.e1276.
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.