Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorMacGregor, Andy
dc.contributor.authorDelaney, Hannah
dc.contributor.authorAmos, Amanda
dc.contributor.authorStead, Martine
dc.contributor.authorEadie, Douglas
dc.contributor.authorPearce, Jamie
dc.contributor.authorOzakinci, Gozde
dc.contributor.authorHaw, Sally
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-11T00:39:06Z
dc.date.available2021-03-11T00:39:06Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-11
dc.identifier.citationMacGregor , A , Delaney , H , Amos , A , Stead , M , Eadie , D , Pearce , J , Ozakinci , G & Haw , S 2020 , ' “It's like sludge green” : young people’s perceptions of standardised tobacco packaging in the UK ' , Addiction , vol. Early View . https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14999en
dc.identifier.issn1360-0443
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 266125145
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: ec678583-ce37-4f91-8c61-208136cb054c
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-5869-3274/work/70919887
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85081314945
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000558086500016
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/21599
dc.descriptionFunding: This project was funded by the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) PHR project 10/3000/07.en
dc.description.abstractBackground and Aims Standardized tobacco packaging was introduced in the United Kingdom in May 2016, together with larger graphic warnings. This study explored young Scottish people's awareness of and perceptions about standardized tobacco packaging in the United Kingdom. Design Qualitative study using 16 focus groups conducted February-March 2017. Setting Four schools in Scotland based in areas of differing socio‐economic status (high versus medium/low) and two levels of urbanity (large urban versus small town/other urban). Participants Eighty‐two S2 (13–14 years) and S4 (15–16 years) students who were smokers or at‐risk non‐smokers. Measurements Focus groups explored perceptions of standardized packaging and health warnings. The qualitative data underwent thematic analysis. Findings Views about standardized packaging were generally negative. Packs were described as being unattractive, drab and less appealing than non‐standardized versions. The new health warnings generated negative affective, often aversive, responses. These varied depending on the image's perceived ‘gruesomeness’ and authenticity. Most participants thought that the impact would be greatest on young non/occasional smokers. There were divergent views about whether established smokers would be affected. Conclusions The introduction of standardized tobacco packaging and new larger graphic health warnings in the United Kingdom seems have reduced the perceived attractiveness of cigarette packs among young people in the United Kingdom who smoke or are at elevated risk of becoming smokers, disrupting positive brand imagery (the brand heuristic), increasing the salience of health warnings and contributing to denormalizing smoking.
dc.format.extent9
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAddictionen
dc.rightsCopyright © 2020 Society for the Study of Addiction. This work has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies or with permission. Permission for further reuse of this content should be sought from the publisher or the rights holder. This is the author created accepted manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14999en
dc.subjectAdolescentsen
dc.subjectCigaretteen
dc.subjectHealth warningsen
dc.subjectPackagingen
dc.subjectQualitativeen
dc.subjectTobaccoen
dc.subjectRJ101 Child Health. Child health servicesen
dc.subjectE-NDASen
dc.subject.lccRJ101en
dc.title“It's like sludge green” : young people’s perceptions of standardised tobacco packaging in the UKen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Population and Behavioural Science Divisionen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Health Psychologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. St Andrews Sustainability Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/add.14999
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2021-03-11


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record