Show simple item record

Files in this item


Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorStreeter, Richard T.
dc.contributor.authorCutler, Nick
dc.identifier.citationStreeter , R T & Cutler , N 2020 , ' Assessing spatial patterns of soil erosion in a high-latitude rangeland ' , Land Degradation & Development , vol. Early View .
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 264190651
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 965cdff1-4fd6-470f-a005-5b543d34354e
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-2261-4540/work/70619054
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85081275226
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000562565300001
dc.descriptionThanks to NSF grant 1202692 for support to RS. NC was supported by a grant from Churchill College, Cambridge. Thanks to Jim Woollet for advice and support. DEMs provided by the Polar Geospatial Center under NSF-OPP awards 1043681, 1559691, and 1542736.en
dc.description.abstractHigh‐latitude areas are experiencing rapid change: we therefore need a better understanding of the processes controlling soil erosion in these environments. We used a spatiotemporal approach to investigate soil erosion in Svalbarðstunga, Iceland (66°N, 15°W), a degraded rangeland. We used three complementary datasets: (a) high‐resolution unmanned‐aerial vehicle imagery collected from 12 sites (total area ~0.75 km2); (b) historical imagery of the same sites; and (c) a simple, spatially‐explicit cellular automata model. Sites were located along a gradient of increasing altitude and distance from the sea, and varied in erosion severity (5–47% eroded). We found that there was no simple relationship between location along the environmental gradient and the spatial characteristics of erosion. Patch‐size frequency distributions lacked a characteristic scale of variation, but followed a power‐law distribution on five of the 12 sites. Present total eroded area is poorly related to current, site‐scale levels of environmental stress, but the number of small erosion patches did reflect site‐level stress. Small (<25 m2) erosion patches clustered near large patches. The model results suggested that the large‐scale patterns observed likely arise from strong, local interactions, which mean that erosion spreads from degraded areas. Our findings suggest that contemporary erosion patterns reflect historical stresses, as well as current environmental conditions. The importance of abiotic processes to the growth of large erosion patches and their relative insensitivity to current environmental conditions makes it likely that the total eroded area will continue to increase, despite a warming climate and reducing levels of grazing pressure.
dc.relation.ispartofLand Degradation & Developmenten
dc.rightsCopyright © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This work has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies or with permission. Permission for further reuse of this content should be sought from the publisher or the rights holder. This is the author created accepted manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at
dc.subjectPatch-size distributionsen
dc.subjectSoil erosionen
dc.subjectCellular automataen
dc.subjectG Geography (General)en
dc.titleAssessing spatial patterns of soil erosion in a high-latitude rangelanden
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Bell-Edwards Geographic Data Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Geography & Sustainable Developmenten
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record