Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBravington, Mark V.
dc.contributor.authorMiller, David Lawrence
dc.contributor.authorHedley, Sharon Louise
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-05T17:30:20Z
dc.date.available2021-03-05T17:30:20Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-23
dc.identifier272862363
dc.identifierb2dab681-8595-473f-821a-0f798448b04d
dc.identifier000621066800001
dc.identifier85101412506
dc.identifier.citationBravington , M V , Miller , D L & Hedley , S L 2021 , ' Variance propagation for density surface models ' , Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics , vol. First Online . https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-021-00438-2en
dc.identifier.issn1085-7117
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/21564
dc.descriptionData from the SCANS-II project were supported by the EU LIFE Nature programme (project LIFE04NAT/GB/000245) and governments of range states: Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, and UK. This work was funded by OPNAV N45 and the SURTASS LFA Settlement Agreement, and being managed by the US Navy’s Living Marine Resources program under Contract No. N39430-17-C-1982, US Navy, Chief of Naval Operations (Code N45), grant number N00244-10-1-0057 and the International Whaling Commission.en
dc.description.abstractSpatially explicit estimates of population density, together with appropriate estimates of uncertainty, are required in many management contexts. Density surface models (DSMs) are a two-stage approach for estimating spatially varying density from distance sampling data. First, detection probabilities—perhaps depending on covariates—are estimated based on details of individual encounters; next, local densities are estimated using a GAM, by fitting local encounter rates to location and/or spatially varying covariates while allowing for the estimated detectabilities. One criticism of DSMs has been that uncertainty from the two stages is not usually propagated correctly into the final variance estimates. We show how to reformulate a DSM so that the uncertainty in detection probability from the distance sampling stage (regardless of its complexity) is captured as an extra random effect in the GAM stage. In effect, we refit an approximation to the detection function model at the same time as fitting the spatial model. This allows straightforward computation of the overall variance via exactly the same software already needed to fit the GAM. A further extension allows for spatial variation in group size, which can be an important covariate for detectability as well as directly affecting abundance. We illustrate these models using point transect survey data of Island Scrub-Jays on Santa Cruz Island, CA, and harbour porpoise from the SCANS-II line transect survey of European waters. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear on-line.
dc.format.extent18
dc.format.extent9881920
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statisticsen
dc.subjectAbundance estimationen
dc.subjectDistance samplingen
dc.subjectGeneralized additive modelsen
dc.subjectLine transect samplingen
dc.subjectPoint transect samplingen
dc.subjectSpatial modellingen
dc.subjectQA Mathematicsen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subject.lccQAen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleVariance propagation for density surface modelsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.sponsorOffice of Naval Researchen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Mathematics and Statisticsen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Research into Ecological & Environmental Modellingen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s13253-021-00438-2
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.grantnumberN00244-10-1-0057en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record