Show simple item record

Files in this item


Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorMerzougui, Wassim H.
dc.contributor.authorMyers, Matthew A.
dc.contributor.authorHall, Samuel
dc.contributor.authorElmansouri, Ahmad
dc.contributor.authorParker, Rob
dc.contributor.authorRobson, Alistair D.
dc.contributor.authorKurn, Octavia
dc.contributor.authorParrott, Rachel
dc.contributor.authorGeoghegan, Kate
dc.contributor.authorHarrison, Charlotte H.
dc.contributor.authorAnbu, Deepika
dc.contributor.authorDean, Oliver
dc.contributor.authorBorder, Scott
dc.identifier.citationMerzougui , W H , Myers , M A , Hall , S , Elmansouri , A , Parker , R , Robson , A D , Kurn , O , Parrott , R , Geoghegan , K , Harrison , C H , Anbu , D , Dean , O & Border , S 2021 , ' Multiple-choice versus open‐ended questions in advanced clinical neuroanatomy : using a national neuroanatomy assessment to investigate variability in performance using different question types ' , Anatomical Sciences Education , vol. Early View .
dc.description.abstractMethods of assessment in anatomy vary across medical schools in the United Kingdom (UK) and beyond; common methods include written, spotter, and oral assessment. However, there is limited research evaluating these methods in regards to student performance and perception. The National Undergraduate Neuroanatomy Competition (NUNC) is held annually for medical students throughout the UK. Prior to 2017, the competition asked open-ended questions (OEQ) in the anatomy spotter examination, and in subsequent years also asked single best answer (SBA) questions. The aim of this study is to assess medical students' performance on, and perception of, SBA and OEQ methods of assessment in a spotter style anatomy examination. Student examination performance was compared between OEQ (2013-2016) and SBA (2017-2020) for overall score and each neuroanatomical subtopic. Additionally, a questionnaire explored students' perceptions of SBAs. A total of 631 students attended the NUNC in the studied period. The average mark was significantly higher in SBAs compared to OEQs (60.6% vs. 43.1%, P <0.0001)-this was true for all neuroanatomical subtopics except the cerebellum. Students felt that they performed better on SBA than OEQs, and diencephalon was felt to be the most difficult neuroanatomical subtopic (n = 38, 34.8%). Students perceived SBA questions to be easier than OEQs and performed significantly better on them in a neuroanatomical spotter examination. Further work is needed to ascertain whether this result is replicable throughout anatomy education.
dc.relation.ispartofAnatomical Sciences Educationen
dc.subjectGross anatomy educationen
dc.subjectNeuroanatomy anatomy educationen
dc.subjectMedical educationen
dc.subjectUndergraduate educationen
dc.subjectMethods of assessmentsen
dc.subjectAnatomy assessmenten
dc.subjectLB2300 Higher Educationen
dc.subjectQM Human anatomyen
dc.subjectR Medicineen
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingen
dc.titleMultiple-choice versus open‐ended questions in advanced clinical neuroanatomy : using a national neuroanatomy assessment to investigate variability in performance using different question typesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record