Avoiding gauge ambiguities in cavity quantum electrodynamics
MetadataShow full item record
Systems of interacting charges and fields are ubiquitous in physics. Recently, it has been shown that Hamiltonians derived using different gauges can yield different physical results when matter degrees of freedom are truncated to a few low-lying energy eigenstates. This effect is particularly prominent in the ultra-strong coupling regime. Such ambiguities arise because transformations reshuffle the partition between light and matter degrees of freedom and so level truncation is a gauge dependent approximation. To avoid this gauge ambiguity, we redefine the electromagnetic fields in terms of potentials for which the resulting canonical momenta and Hamiltonian are explicitly unchanged by the gauge choice of this theory. Instead the light/matter partition is assigned by the intuitive choice of separating an electric field between displacement and polarisation contributions. This approach is an attractive choice in typical cavity quantum electrodynamics situations.
Rouse , D M , Lovett , B W , Gauger , E M & Westerberg , N 2021 , ' Avoiding gauge ambiguities in cavity quantum electrodynamics ' , Scientific Reports , vol. 11 , 4281 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83214-z
Copyright © The Author(s) 2021. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
DescriptionDMR was supported by the UK EPSRC Grant No. EP/L015110/1. EMG acknowledges support from the Royal Society of Edinburgh and Scottish Government and UK EPSRC Grant No. EP/T007214/1. NW wishes to acknowledge financial support from UK EPSRC Grant No. EP/R513222/1 and EP/R030413/1.
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.