Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorProsser, Simon
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-21T00:35:14Z
dc.date.available2021-01-21T00:35:14Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-13
dc.identifier257295292
dc.identifier974ddc89-1dd0-4f3c-a8bc-465bc2786208
dc.identifier85060347538
dc.identifier000532571500007
dc.identifier.citationProsser , S 2020 , ' The metaphysics of mental files ' , Philosophy and Phenomenological Research , vol. 100 , no. 3 , pp. 657-676 . https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12577en
dc.identifier.issn0031-8205
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-7444-2782/work/67525833
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/21292
dc.description.abstractThere is much to be said for a diachronic or interpersonal individuation of singular modes of presentation (MOPs) in terms of a criterion of epistemic transparency between thought tokens. This way of individuating MOPs has been discussed recently within the mental files framework, though the issues discussed here arise for all theories that individuate MOPs in terms of relations among tokens. All such theories face objections concerning apparent failures of the transitivity of the ‘same MOP’ relation. For mental files, these transitivity failures most obviously occur because mental files can merge or undergo fission. In this paper I argue that this problem is easily resolved once mental files are properly construed as continuants, whose metaphysics is analogous to that of persons or physical objects. All continuants can undergo fission or fusion, leading to similar transitivity problems, but there are well-established theories of persistence that accommodate this. I suggest that, in particular, the stage theory best suits the purposes of a continuant theory of MOPs.
dc.format.extent274305
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPhilosophy and Phenomenological Researchen
dc.subjectB Philosophy (General)en
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subjectBDCen
dc.subjectR2Cen
dc.subject.lccB1en
dc.titleThe metaphysics of mental filesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Philosophyen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/phpr.12577
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2021-01-21


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record