Show simple item record

Files in this item


Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorPocock, Michael J.O.
dc.contributor.authorMarzano, Mariella
dc.contributor.authorBullas-Appleton, Erin
dc.contributor.authorDyke, Alison
dc.contributor.authorde Groot, Maarten
dc.contributor.authorShuttleworth, Craig M.
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Rehema
dc.identifier.citationPocock , M J O , Marzano , M , Bullas-Appleton , E , Dyke , A , de Groot , M , Shuttleworth , C M & White , R 2020 , ' Ethical dilemmas when using citizen science for early detection of invasive tree pests and diseases ' , Management of Biological Invasions , vol. 11 , no. 4 , pp. 720-732 .
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 271800508
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: ba58bb93-36e7-4bc6-a29a-b86a5d56988c
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85097496445
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-9669-0012/work/85855023
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000589799900007
dc.descriptionThis article is a part of the conference Detection and control of alien forest species in a changing world organized by the project LIFE ARTEMIS (LIFE15 GIE/SI/000770), co-funded by the LIFE programme, Ministry of Environment and Spatial planning of the Republic of Slovenia, the Municipality of Ljubljana and the Slovenian Research Agency. The article processing charges were covered by the project LIFE ARTEMIS.en
dc.description.abstractThe early detection of tree health pests and disease is an important component of biosecurity to protect the aesthetic, recreational and economic importance of trees, woodlands and forestry. Citizen science is valuable in supporting the early detection of tree pests and diseases. Different stakeholders (government, business, society and individual) will vary in their opinion of the balance between costs and benefits of early detection and consequent management, partly because many costs are local whereas benefits are felt at larger scales. This can create clashes in motivations of those involved in citizen science, thus leading to ethical dilemmas about what is good and responsible conduct for the use of citizen science. We draw on our experience of tree health citizen science to exemplify five dilemmas. These dilemmas arise because: the consequences of detection may locally be severe (e.g. the destruction of trees); knowledge of these impacts could lead to refusal to make citizen science reports; citizen science reports can be made freely, but can be costly to respond to; participants may expect solutions even if these are not possible; and early detection is (by definition) a rare event. Effective engagement and dialogue across stakeholders, including public stakeholders, is important to properly address these issues. This is vital to ensure the public’s long-term support for and trust in the use of citizen science for the early detection of tree pests and diseases.
dc.relation.ispartofManagement of Biological Invasionsen
dc.rightsCopyright: © Pocock et al. This is an open access article distributed under terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (Attribution 4.0 International - CC BY 4.0)en
dc.subjectAlien speciesen
dc.subjectParticipatory researchen
dc.subjectG Geography (General)en
dc.subjectEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematicsen
dc.subjectManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Lawen
dc.titleEthical dilemmas when using citizen science for early detection of invasive tree pests and diseasesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Geographies of Sustainability, Society, Inequalities and Possibilitiesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Geography & Sustainable Developmenten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Centre for Higher Education Researchen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.St Andrews Sustainability Instituteen
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record