Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorPototsky, Christy
dc.contributor.authorCresswell, Will
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-17T11:30:08Z
dc.date.available2020-12-17T11:30:08Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-02
dc.identifier265942443
dc.identifiere21f2a6a-8258-4bf8-af18-cb3eed42bd63
dc.identifier85097232831
dc.identifier000721328300029
dc.identifier.citationPototsky , C & Cresswell , W 2020 , ' Conservation research output in sub-Saharan Africa is increasing, but only in a few countries ' , Oryx , vol. 54 , no. FirstView . https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605320000046en
dc.identifier.issn0030-6053
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-4684-7624/work/85563020
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/21171
dc.description.abstractWe tested if peer-reviewed conservation research output has increased in sub-Saharan African countries over the last 30 years in response to increased development. We carried out a bibliometric analysis to identify the number of conservation research papers published by national authors of 41 sub-Saharan African countries during 1987–2017, to provide an index of national conservation research output. We identified country-specific development factors influencing these totals, using general linear modelling. There were positive relationships between conservation research output and population size, GDP, literacy rate, international tourism receipts and population growth rate, and negative relationships with urban population and agricultural land cover, in total explaining 77% of variation. Thirty-eight per cent of countries contributed < 30 conservation research papers (of 12,701) in 30 years. Analysis of trends in primary authorship in a random subsample of 2,374 of these papers showed that primary authorship by sub-Saharan African authors has increased significantly over time but is now at a lower rate than primary authorship for authors from countries outside the country associated with the search term, usually a European or North American country. Overall, 46% of papers had national primary authors, but 67% of these were South African. The results show that conservation research output in sub-Saharan Africa overall is increasing but only significantly in a few countries, and is still dominated by non-national scientists, probably as a result of a lack of socio-economic development.
dc.format.extent10
dc.format.extent303721
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofOryxen
dc.subjectConservation biologyen
dc.subjectCapacity buildingen
dc.subjectDevelopmenten
dc.subjectResearch trendsen
dc.subjectPapersen
dc.subjectPublicationsen
dc.subjectResearch capacityen
dc.subjectSub-Saharan Africanen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectZA4050 Electronic information resourcesen
dc.subject3rd-DASen
dc.subjectSDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growthen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.subject.lccZA4050en
dc.titleConservation research output in sub-Saharan Africa is increasing, but only in a few countriesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Biological Diversityen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciencesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. St Andrews Sustainability Instituteen
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0030605320000046
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record