Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorRobins, Daniel Jacob
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-09T00:37:06Z
dc.date.available2020-12-09T00:37:06Z
dc.date.issued2019-12
dc.identifier.citationRobins , D J 2019 , ' Imagining London : the role of the geographical imagination in migrant subjectivity and decision-making ' , Area , vol. 51 , no. 4 , pp. 728-735 . https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12519en
dc.identifier.issn0004-0894
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 257443926
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 2cc8e680-f101-414b-9807-9340eff1162a
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85058169427
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000494691500014
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/21122
dc.descriptionFunding: St Andrews’ Janet T Anderson Scholarshipen
dc.description.abstractThis article employs a qualitative, biographical approach, to explore the motivations and subjectivities behind migration of middle‐class Brazilians to London. It uses the concept of the geographical imagination to understand how migrants imagine not only their destinations and places of origin but also how their own identity is shaped by their imagined relationship to these places. The paper argues that for many middle‐class Brazilians, their motivation to migrate is couched in terms of “societal alienation”: a feeling of distance from the place of origin resulting from a lack of identification and trust in its institutions and the very culture of the place itself. This is in contrast to the more popularly understood concept of migrating due to “material alienation”: migrating to access a higher level of material consumption or to acquire financial capital to use “back home.” For those who migrate due to “societal alienation” what is “fetishised” is the cultural and less material aspects of the ‘quality of life’ of the migration destination, which become a kind of commodity in their own right. It argues that social class which often intersects with regional and racial divisions within Brazilian society, is a key marker of difference in these two types of imaginary.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAreaen
dc.rights© 2018, Royal Geographical Society (with the Insitute of British Geographers). This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher's policies. This is the author created accepted version manuscript following peer review and as such may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12519en
dc.subjectBrazilen
dc.subjectClassen
dc.subjectGeographical imaginationen
dc.subjectInequalityen
dc.subjectLondonen
dc.subjectMigrationen
dc.subjectF1201 Latin America (General)en
dc.subjectGF Human ecology. Anthropogeographyen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subject.lccF1201en
dc.subject.lccGFen
dc.titleImagining London : the role of the geographical imagination in migrant subjectivity and decision-makingen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Geography & Sustainable Developmenten
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/area.12519
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2020-12-09


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record