Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorNijhuis, R. H.T.
dc.contributor.authorGuerendiain, D.
dc.contributor.authorClaas, E. C.J.
dc.contributor.authorTempleton, K. E.
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-23T15:30:42Z
dc.date.available2020-11-23T15:30:42Z
dc.date.issued2017-06
dc.identifier.citationNijhuis , R H T , Guerendiain , D , Claas , E C J & Templeton , K E 2017 , ' Comparison of ePlex respiratory pathogen panel with laboratory-developed real-time PCR assays for detection of respiratory pathogens ' , Journal of Clinical Microbiology , vol. 55 , no. 6 , pp. 1938-1945 . https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00221-17en
dc.identifier.issn0095-1137
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 270078460
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: f2f7f981-c87e-4a1d-9f8c-1a43e1020115
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85019572081
dc.identifier.otherPubMed: 28404682
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-7536-1308/work/80257961
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/21048
dc.description.abstractInfections of the respiratory tract can be caused by a diversity of pathogens, both viral and bacterial. Rapid microbiological diagnosis ensures appropriate antimicrobial therapy as well as effective implementation of isolation precautions. The ePlex respiratory pathogen panel (RP panel) is a novel molecular biology-based assay, developed by GenMark Diagnostics, Inc. (Carlsbad, CA), to be performed within a single cartridge for the diagnosis of 25 respiratory pathogens (viral and bacterial). The objective of this study was to compare the performance of the RP panel with those of laboratory-developed real-time PCR assays, using a variety of previously collected clinical respiratory specimens. A total of 343 clinical specimens as well as 29 external quality assessment (EQA) specimens and 2 different Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus isolates have been assessed in this study. The RP panel showed an agreement of 97.4% with the real-time PCR assay regarding 464 pathogens found in the clinical specimens. All pathogens present in clinical samples and EQA samples with a threshold cycle (CT) value of <30 were detected correctly using the RP panel. The RP panel detected 17 additional pathogens, 7 of which could be confirmed by discrepant testing. In conclusion, this study shows excellent performance of the RP panel in comparison to real-time PCR assays for the detection of respiratory pathogens. The ePlex system provided a large amount of useful diagnostic data within a short time frame, with minimal hands-on time, and can therefore potentially be used for rapid diagnostic sample-to-answer testing, in either a laboratory or a decentralized setting.
dc.format.extent8
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Microbiologyen
dc.rightsCopyright © 2017 Nijhuis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.en
dc.subjectInfluenzaen
dc.subjectPoint-of-care testingen
dc.subjectRapid diagnosticsen
dc.subjectRespiratory pathogensen
dc.subjectSample-to-answeren
dc.subjectQR Microbiologyen
dc.subjectRB Pathologyen
dc.subjectMicrobiology (medical)en
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subject.lccQRen
dc.subject.lccRBen
dc.titleComparison of ePlex respiratory pathogen panel with laboratory-developed real-time PCR assays for detection of respiratory pathogensen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Infection and Global Health Divisionen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00221-17
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record