Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorGardner, Andy
dc.contributor.authorHardy, Ian
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-19T09:30:05Z
dc.date.available2020-11-19T09:30:05Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-18
dc.identifier.citationGardner , A & Hardy , I 2020 , ' Adjustment of sex allocation to co-foundress number and kinship under local mate competition : an inclusive-fitness analysis ' , Journal of Evolutionary Biology , vol. Early View . https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13719en
dc.identifier.issn1010-061X
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 270734525
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 8036689c-d506-4c78-a11a-0871da764768
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85096697967
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000590170700001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/21007
dc.descriptionAG is supported by a Natural Environment Research Council Independent Research Fellowship (NE/K009524/1) and a European Research Council Consolidator Grant (771387).en
dc.description.abstractHamilton’s theory of local mate competition (LMC) describes how competition between male relatives for mating opportunities favours a female‐biased parental investment. LMC theory has been extended in many ways to explore a range of genetic and life‐history influences on sex allocation strategies, including showing that increasing genetic homogeneity within mating groups should favour greater female bias. However, there has been no quantitative theoretical prediction as to how females should facultatively adjust their sex allocation in response to co‐foundress number and kinship. This shortfall has been highlighted recently by the finding that sex ratios produced by sub‐social parasitoid wasps in the family Bethylidae are affected by the number of co‐foundresses and by whether these are sisters or unrelated females. Here we close this gap in LMC theory by taking an inclusive‐fitness approach to derive explicit theoretical predictions for this scenario. We find that, in line with the recent empirical results, females should adopt a more female‐biased sex allocation when their co‐foundresses are less numerous and are their sisters. Our model appears to predict somewhat more female bias than is observed empirically; we discuss a number of possible model extensions that would improve realism and that would be expected to result in a closer quantitative fit with experimental data.
dc.format.extent7
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Evolutionary Biologyen
dc.rightsCopyright © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society for Evolutionary Biology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en
dc.subjectFoundress kinshipen
dc.subjectLMCen
dc.subjectParasitoiden
dc.subjectSex ratioen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleAdjustment of sex allocation to co-foundress number and kinship under local mate competition : an inclusive-fitness analysisen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Centre for Biological Diversityen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13719
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record