Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authoriGEM Interlab Study Contributors
dc.contributor.authorMelo Czekster, Clarissa
dc.contributor.authorPowis, Simon John
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-13T15:30:12Z
dc.date.available2020-11-13T15:30:12Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-17
dc.identifier271216970
dc.identifierd7597d0f-7eed-452c-9fe8-4fa2c7cc52fa
dc.identifier85091192744
dc.identifier.citationiGEM Interlab Study Contributors , Melo Czekster , C & Powis , S J 2020 , ' Robust estimation of bacterial cell count from optical density ' , Communications Biology , vol. 3 , 512 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01127-5en
dc.identifier.issn2399-3642
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-4218-2984/work/83481369
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-7163-4057/work/83481911
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/20971
dc.descriptionPartial support for this work was provided by NSF Expeditions in Computing Program Award #1522074 as part of the Living Computing Project, and by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/R034915/1] and EU H2020 [820699].en
dc.description.abstractOptical density (OD) is widely used to estimate the density of cells in liquid culture, but cannot be compared between instruments without a standardized calibration protocol and is challenging to relate to actual cell count. We address this with an interlaboratory study comparing three simple, low-cost, and highly accessible OD calibration protocols across 244 laboratories, applied to eight strains of constitutive GFP-expressing E. coli. Based on our results, we recommend calibrating OD to estimated cell count using serial dilution of silica microspheres, which produces highly precise calibration (95.5% of residuals  <1.2-fold), is easily assessed for quality control, also assesses instrument effective linear range, and can be combined with fluorescence calibration to obtain units of Molecules of Equivalent Fluorescein (MEFL) per cell, allowing direct comparison and data fusion with flow cytometry measurements: in our study, fluorescence per cell measurements showed only a 1.07-fold mean difference between plate reader and flow cytometry data.
dc.format.extent29
dc.format.extent1458978
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofCommunications Biologyen
dc.subjectQR Microbiologyen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subject.lccQRen
dc.titleRobust estimation of bacterial cell count from optical densityen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Biomedical Sciences Research Complexen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Biophotonicsen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Cellular Medicine Divisionen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01127-5
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01371-9en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record