Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorNeville, Fergus G.
dc.contributor.authorDrury, John
dc.contributor.authorReicher, Stephen David
dc.contributor.authorChoudhury, Sanjeedah
dc.contributor.authorStott, Clifford
dc.contributor.authorBall, Roger
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-02T12:30:08Z
dc.date.available2020-11-02T12:30:08Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-30
dc.identifier.citationNeville , F G , Drury , J , Reicher , S D , Choudhury , S , Stott , C , Ball , R & Richardson , D 2020 , ' Self-categorization as a basis of behavioural mimicry : experiments in The Hive ' , PLoS One , vol. 15 , no. 10 , e0241227 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241227en
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 270685505
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 6af2a5e6-870a-483d-8865-98c4d612615d
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-7377-4507/work/83086232
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85094982576
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000588368900039
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/20880
dc.descriptionJD, SR and CS received grant ES/N01068X/1 from the Economic and Social Research Council (https://esrc.ukri.org/).en
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Do we always do what others do, and, if not, when and under what conditions do we do so? In this paper we test the hypothesis that mimicry is moderated by the mere knowledge of whether the source is a member of the same social category as ourselves. Methods We investigated group influence on mimicry using three tasks on a software platform which interfaces with mobile computing devices to allow the controlled study of collective behaviour in an everyday environment. Results Overall, participants (N = 965) were influenced by the movements of confederates (represented as dots on a screen) who belonged to their own category in both purposive and incidental tasks. Conclusion Our results are compatible with collective level explanations of social influence premised on shared social identification. This includes both a heuristic of unintended mimicry (the acts of group members are diagnostic of how one should act), and communication of affiliation (based on a desire to make one’s group cohesive). The results are incompatible with traditional ‘contagion’ accounts which suggest mimicry is automatic and inevitable. The results have practical implications for designing behavioural interventions which can harness the power of copying behaviour, for example in emergency evacuations.
dc.format.extent17
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS Oneen
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2020 Neville et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en
dc.subjectMimicryen
dc.subjectSocial influenceen
dc.subjectSocial identityen
dc.subjectSelf-categorizationen
dc.subjectShared social identificationen
dc.subjectShared identityen
dc.subjectHeuristicsen
dc.subjectContagionen
dc.subjectBF Psychologyen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subject.lccBFen
dc.titleSelf-categorization as a basis of behavioural mimicry : experiments in The Hiveen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Managementen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241227
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record