Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorSikkink, Kristin L.
dc.contributor.authorBailey, Nathan W.
dc.contributor.authorZuk, Marlene
dc.contributor.authorBalenger, Susan L.
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-30T12:30:15Z
dc.date.available2020-10-30T12:30:15Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-26
dc.identifier270956468
dc.identifier1ed2da99-0b19-4e97-b3ee-da3c4a94024f
dc.identifier85093917269
dc.identifier000583622500001
dc.identifier.citationSikkink , K L , Bailey , N W , Zuk , M & Balenger , S L 2020 , ' Immunogenetic and tolerance strategies against a novel parasitoid of wild field crickets ' , Ecology and Evolution , vol. Early view . https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6930en
dc.identifier.issn2045-7758
dc.identifier.otherRIS: urn:371C6F0C37AA14A59FF0DA4BCB10D595
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-3531-7756/work/82788901
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/20863
dc.description.abstractAmong the parasites of insects, endoparasitoids impose a costly challenge to host defenses because they use their host?s body for the development and maturation of their eggs or larvae, and ultimately kill the host. Tachinid flies are highly specialized acoustically orienting parasitoids, with first instar mobile larvae that burrow into the host's body to feed. We investigated the possibility that Teleogryllus oceanicus field crickets employ postinfestation strategies to maximize survival when infested with the larvae of the parasitoid fly Ormia ochracea. Using crickets from the Hawaiian Islands of Kauai, where the parasitoid is present, and crickets from the Cook Islands (Mangaia), where the parasitoid is absent, we evaluated fitness consequences of infestation by comparing feeding behavior, reproductive capacity, and survival of males experimentally infested with O. ochracea larvae. We also evaluated mechanisms underlying host responses by comparing gene expression in crickets infested with fly larvae for different lengths of time with that of uninfested control crickets. We observed weak population differences in fitness (spermatophore production) and survival (total survival time postinfestation). These responses generally did not show an interaction between population and the number of larva hosts carried or by host body condition. Gene expression patterns also revealed population differences in response to infestation, but we did not find evidence for consistent differences in genes associated with immunity or stress response. One possibility is that any postinfestation evolved resistance does not involve genes associated with these particular functional categories. More likely, these results suggest that coevolution with the fly does not strongly select for either postinfestation resistance or tolerance of parasitoid larvae in male crickets.
dc.format.extent15
dc.format.extent1768680
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEcology and Evolutionen
dc.subjectOrmia ochraceaen
dc.subjectResistanceen
dc.subjectTeleogryllus oceanicusen
dc.subjectTranscriptomicsen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectQR180 Immunologyen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.subject.lccQR180en
dc.titleImmunogenetic and tolerance strategies against a novel parasitoid of wild field cricketsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Biological Diversityen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6930
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record