Files in this item
|dc.identifier.citation||Rea , M 2020 , ' Hopeful universalism ' , Religious Studies , vol. First View . https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412520000402||en|
|dc.identifier.other||PURE UUID: 93171a9a-67c1-4b47-8767-95a3e781d1ee|
|dc.description.abstract||This article argues against the rationality of ‘hopeful universalism’, the components of which include the unconditional considered hope that soteriological universalism is true, and an absence of belief that it is true. Some proponents maintain that there is simply not enough evidence to affirm or deny universalism; others believe that it is probably false but nonetheless hope they are mistaken. This article argues that worshippers of God who maintain unconditional considered hope in the truth of universalism ought either to believe universalism or seek to abandon their hope in its truth, depending (in part) on how their confidence in the considerations that steer them away from universalism measure up against the beliefs that underwrite their hope in its truth. For such people, neither withholding belief in universalism nor believing that it is false while continuing to hope that it is true is a rational option.|
|dc.rights||Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press. This work has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies or with permission. Permission for further reuse of this content should be sought from the publisher or the rights holder. This is the author created accepted manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412520000402||en|
|dc.contributor.institution||University of St Andrews. School of Divinity||en|
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.