The source of sulfate in brachiopod calcite : insights from μ-XRF imaging and XANES spectroscopy

Abstract

Geochemical signatures preserved in sedimentary carbonate strata are often used as archives for paleoenvironmental reconstructions. However, diagenetic overprinting and/or muting of primary geochemical signatures complicates the interpretation of these data. To avoid this issue, geochemical techniques strive to target unaltered (or minimally altered) carbonate components. The multi-layer low-Mg calcite shell composition of articulate brachiopods are often the target in such studies because they are commonly more robust to recrystallization than the shells of other biomineralizers. Here, we have combined S K-edge μ-XRF imaging, XANES spectroscopy and petrography to determine the source of sulfate in the calcite lattice (carbonate-associated sulfate; CAS) of ancient and extant brachiopods, in order to establish their suitability for use in reconstructing seawater sulfate δ34S throughout the Phanerozoic. Both the extant brachiopod Terebratalia transversa and fossil brachiopods display intra-specimen variability in sulfate abundance parallel to the primary fabric, likely corresponding to variations in growth rate. XANES spectroscopy identifies a majority of the sulfate as inorganic. Additionally, XANES spectroscopy detected low abundances of both reduced and oxidized organic sulfur species (thiol, thioether, sulfoxide and sulfate esters) in all T. transversa samples and lesser abundances in a few of the fossil brachiopods. In T. transversa, inorganic sulfate and sulfate ester abundance increase towards the hinge of the valves. Bulk δ34SCAS of the samples containing the fossil brachiopods are consistently more positive than time-equivalent brachiopod-only values, likely reflecting a mixture of CAS signals from homogenization of carbonate components differentially affected by depositional environment and diagenesis. In contrast, bulk δ34SCAS of modern T. transversa is approximately 1‰ more positive than coeval seawater. Although organic sulfate esters are found within the brachiopod shells, they are only ever present as trace components. Our findings indicate that the vast majority of sulfate in brachiopod shells is inorganic, sourced from coeval seawater. This result supports the use of brachiopods as a potential archive for a faithful CAS record of seawater sulfate throughout the Phanerozoic. The characterization of in situ organic sulfur compounds in both extant and fossil brachiopods indicates the potential importance of various organic sulfur compounds in mineralogical determination (and therefore fossil preservation) and crystal orientation during brachiopod biomineralization throughout geologic time.