Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorProsser, Simon
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-08T23:34:54Z
dc.date.available2020-10-08T23:34:54Z
dc.date.issued2019-09
dc.identifier252182557
dc.identifier6a9f11bd-ac0c-42ad-80f1-778c398f8785
dc.identifier85054696678
dc.identifier000481816900003
dc.identifier.citationProsser , S 2019 , ' Shared modes of presentation ' , Mind & Language , vol. 34 , no. 4 , pp. 465-482 . https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12219en
dc.identifier.issn0268-1064
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-7444-2782/work/67525836
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/20749
dc.description.abstractWhat is it for two people to think of something under the same mode of presentation (MOP)? This has seemed a difficult question for “atomistic” theories such as the Mental Files approach or the Language of Thought hypothesis. Here I propose a simple answer. I first argue that, by parallel with the synchronic intrapersonal case, the sharing of a MOP should involve epistemic transparency between the token thoughts of the two thinkers. I then explain how shared words help bring about this transparency. Finally, I show how the account can deal with MOPs expressed using demonstratives and indexicals.
dc.format.extent266599
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofMind & Languageen
dc.subjectConceptsen
dc.subjectIndexicalsen
dc.subjectLanguage of thoughten
dc.subjectMental filesen
dc.subjectModes of presentationen
dc.subjectShared thoughtsen
dc.subjectB Philosophy (General)en
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccB1en
dc.titleShared modes of presentationen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Philosophyen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/mila.12219
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2020-10-09


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record