Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Christine
dc.contributor.authorDouglas, Anne
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Linda
dc.contributor.authorCezard, Geneviève
dc.contributor.authorBrewster, David H
dc.contributor.authorBuchanan, Duncan
dc.contributor.authorRobb, Kathryn
dc.contributor.authorStanners, Greig
dc.contributor.authorWeller, David
dc.contributor.authorSteele, Robert JC
dc.contributor.authorSteiner, Markus
dc.contributor.authorBhopal, Raj
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-08T16:30:02Z
dc.date.available2020-10-08T16:30:02Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-07
dc.identifier270619542
dc.identifier2e354ae2-fbe2-4e45-ae83-121be5354efc
dc.identifier85092553482
dc.identifier000583298100028
dc.identifier.citationCampbell , C , Douglas , A , Williams , L , Cezard , G , Brewster , D H , Buchanan , D , Robb , K , Stanners , G , Weller , D , Steele , R JC , Steiner , M & Bhopal , R 2020 , ' Are there ethnic and religious variations in uptake of bowel cancer screening? A retrospective cohort study among 1.7 million people in Scotland ' , BMJ Open , vol. 10 , no. 10 , e037011 . https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037011en
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.otherRIS: urn:A732A54E5F149114E2240609FDD1A832
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-3011-7416/work/81797905
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/20748
dc.descriptionThis work was supported by the Chief Scientist’s Office (grant number CZH/4/878), Cancer Research UK (grant number C3743/A16594), and supplementary funding from NHS Health Scotland. ISD and National Records of Scotland both made ‘in-house’ contributions to the work.en
dc.description.abstractObjective Cancer screening should be equitably accessed by all populations. Uptake of colorectal cancer screening was examined using the Scottish Health and Ethnicity Linkage Study that links the Scottish Census 2001 to health data by individual-level self-reported ethnicity and religion. Setting Data on 1.7 million individuals in two rounds of the Scottish Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (2007–2013) were linked to the 2001 Census using the Scottish Community Health Index number. Main outcome measure Uptake of colorectal cancer screening, reported as age-adjusted risk ratios (RRs) by ethnic group and religion were calculated for men and women with 95% CI. Results In the first, incidence screening round, compared with white Scottish men, Other White British (RR 109.6, 95% CI 108.8 to 110.3) and Chinese (107.2, 95% CI 102.8 to 111.8) men had higher uptake. In contrast, men of all South Asian groups had lower uptake (Indian RR 80.5, 95% CI 76.1 to 85.1; Pakistani RR 65.9, 95% CI 62.7 to 69.3; Bangladeshi RR 76.6, 95% CI 63.9 to 91.9; Other South Asian RR 88.6, 95% CI 81.8 to 96.1). Comparable patterns were seen among women in all ethnic groups, for example, Pakistani (RR 55.5, 95% CI 52.5 to 58.8). Variation in uptake was also observed by religion, with lower rates among Hindu (RR (95%CI): 78.4 (71.8 to 85.6)), Muslim (69.5 (66.7 to 72.3)) and Sikh (73.4 (67.1 to 80.3)) men compared with the reference population (Church of Scotland), with similar variation among women: lower rates were also seen among those who reported being Jewish, Roman Catholic or with no religion. Conclusions There are important variations in uptake of bowel cancer screening by ethnic group and religion in Scotland, for both sexes, that require further research and targeted interventions.
dc.format.extent11
dc.format.extent1036491
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Openen
dc.subjectRA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicineen
dc.subjectRC0254 Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology (including Cancer)en
dc.subject3rd-DASen
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingen
dc.subject.lccRA0421en
dc.subject.lccRC0254en
dc.titleAre there ethnic and religious variations in uptake of bowel cancer screening? A retrospective cohort study among 1.7 million people in Scotlanden
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Geography & Sustainable Developmenten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Population and Health Researchen
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037011
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record