Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorMitchell, A. G.
dc.contributor.authorHarris, Julie
dc.contributor.authorBenstock, S. E.
dc.contributor.authorAles, Justin Michael
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-16T14:30:02Z
dc.date.available2020-09-16T14:30:02Z
dc.date.issued2020-11
dc.identifier.citationMitchell , A G , Harris , J , Benstock , S E & Ales , J M 2020 , ' The reliability of pseudoneglect is task dependent ' , Neuropsychologia , vol. 148 , 107618 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107618en
dc.identifier.issn0028-3932
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 269824667
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 1e455ba8-2804-4319-89b5-9de3f3794ce5
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-3497-4503/work/80257393
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85090836943
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/20632
dc.descriptionFunding: This work was supported by the University of St. Andrews and by Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Funds (105621/Z/14/Z).en
dc.description.abstractBisection tasks that require individuals to identify the midpoint of a line are often used to assess the presence of biases to spatial attention in both healthy and patient populations. These tasks have helped to uncover a phenomenon called pseudoneglect, a bias towards the left-side of space in healthy individuals. First identified in the tactile domain, pseudoneglect has been subsequently demonstrated in other sensory modalities such as vision. Despite this, the specific reliability of pseudoneglect within individuals across tasks and time has been investigated very little. In this study, we investigated the reliability of response bias within individuals across four separate testing sessions and during three line bisection tasks: landmark, line bisection and tactile rod bisection. Strong reliability was expected within individuals across task and session. Pseudoneglect was found when response bias was averaged across all tasks, for the entire sample. However, individual data showed biases to both left and right, with some participants showing no clear bias, demonstrating individual differences in bias. Significant, cross-session within-individual reliability was found for the landmark and tactile rod bisection tasks respectively, but no significant reliability was observed for the line bisection task. Alongside this, no significant cross-task within-individual reliability was observed. These results highlight the inconsistent nature of pseudoneglect within individuals, particularly across sensory modality. They also provide strong support for the use of the landmark task as the most reliable measure of pseudoneglect.
dc.format.extent10
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofNeuropsychologiaen
dc.rightsCopyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en
dc.subjectPseudoneglecten
dc.subjectAttentionen
dc.subjectPerceptionen
dc.subjectReliabilityen
dc.subjectBF Psychologyen
dc.subjectRC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatryen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subject.lccBFen
dc.subject.lccRC0321en
dc.titleThe reliability of pseudoneglect is task dependenten
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciencesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107618
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record