Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorLeidenhag, Mikael
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-31T09:30:02Z
dc.date.available2020-08-31T09:30:02Z
dc.date.issued2020-09
dc.identifier269246310
dc.identifier491a7e89-e68e-4039-be92-c1a093125801
dc.identifier85089904943
dc.identifier000563099700008
dc.identifier.citationLeidenhag , M 2020 , ' The problem of natural divine causation and the benefits of partial causation : a response to Skogholt ' , Zygon , vol. 55 , no. 3 , pp. 696-709 . https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12632en
dc.identifier.issn0591-2385
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/20528
dc.description.abstractIn this article, I defend my previous argument that natural divine causation suffers under the problem of causal overdetermination and that it cannot serve as a line of demarcation between theistic evolution (TE) and intelligent design (ID). I do this in light of Christoffer Skogholt's critique of my article. I argue that Skogholt underestimates the naturalistic ambitions of some current thinkers in TE and fails, therefore, to adequately respond to my main argument. I also outline how partial causation better serves as a model for the relationship between God's providence and evolution.
dc.format.extent144734
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofZygonen
dc.subjectCausalityen
dc.subjectIntelligent designen
dc.subjectOverdeterminationen
dc.subjectPanentheismen
dc.subjectTheistic evolutionen
dc.subjectTheistic naturalismen
dc.subjectBV Practical Theologyen
dc.subjectQ Scienceen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccBVen
dc.subject.lccQen
dc.titleThe problem of natural divine causation and the benefits of partial causation : a response to Skogholten
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Divinityen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/zygo.12632
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record