Mindfulness interventions delivered by technology without facilitator involvement : what research exists and what are the clinical outcomes?
MetadataShow full item record
New cost-effective psychological interventions are needed to contribute to treatment options for psychiatric and physical health conditions. This systematic review aims to investigate the current literature on one potentially cost-effective form of mindfulness-based therapy, those delivered through technological platforms without any mindfulness facilitator input beyond the initial design of the programme. Three electronic databases (Ovid Medline, PsychINFO and Embase) were searched for relevant keywords, titles, medical subject headings (MeSH) and abstracts using search terms derived from a combination of two subjects: ‘mindfulness’ and ‘technology’. Overall, ten studies were identified. The majority of studies were web-based and similar in structure and content to face-to-face mindfulness-based stress reduction courses. Clinical outcomes of stress (n = 5), depression (n = 6) and anxiety (n = 4) were reported along with mindfulness (n = 4), the supposed mediator of effects. All eight studies that measured significance found at least some significant effects (p <.05). The highest reported effect sizes were large (stress d = 1.57, depression d =.95, both ps >.005). However, methodological issues (e.g. selection bias, lack of control group and follow-up) which reflect the early nature of the work mean these largest effects are likely to be representative of maximal rather than average effects. Whilst there are important differences in the construction, length and delivery of interventions, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions about the most effective models. Suggestions of key characteristics are made though, needing further investigation preferably in standardised interventions. Given the existing research and the speed at which technology is making new platforms and tools available, it seems important that further research explores two parallel lines: first, refinement and thorough evaluation of already established technology-based mindfulness programmes and second, exploration of novel approaches to mindfulness training that combine the latest technological advances with the knowledge and skills of experienced meditation teachers.
Fish , J , Brimson , J & Lynch , S 2016 , ' Mindfulness interventions delivered by technology without facilitator involvement : what research exists and what are the clinical outcomes? ' , Mindfulness , vol. 7 , no. 5 , pp. 1011-1023 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0548-2
Copyright © 2016 the Author(s). This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Neldner, Karri; Reindl, Eva; Tennie, Claudio; Grant, Julie; Tomaselli, Keyan; Nielsen, Mark (2020-05-15) - Journal articleThrough the mechanisms of observation, imitation and teaching, young children readily pick up the tool using behaviours of their culture. However, little is known about the baseline abilities of children's tool use: what ...
Byrne, Richard W.; Cochet, Hélène (2017-02) - Journal articleComparative analysis of the gestural communication of our nearest animal relatives, the great apes, implies that humans should have the biological potential to produce and understand 60–70 gestures, by virtue of shared ...
Caldwell, Christine A.; Atkinson, Mark; Blakey, Kirsten H.; Dunstone, Juliet; Kean, Donna; Mackintosh, Gemma; Renner, Elizabeth; Wilks, Charlotte E. H. (2019-12-05) - Journal itemIn the current literature, there are few experimental tests of capacities for cumulative cultural evolution in nonhuman species. There are even fewer examples of such tests in young children. This limited evidence is ...