Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorHitchcock, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorGardner, Andy
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-12T11:30:08Z
dc.date.available2020-08-12T11:30:08Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-12
dc.identifier.citationHitchcock , T & Gardner , A 2020 , ' A gene’s-eye view of sexual antagonism ' , Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences , vol. 287 , no. 1932 , 20201633 . https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1633en
dc.identifier.issn0962-8452
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 269236100
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 5284ee84-992e-4cd7-8beb-c8d1b0a51778
dc.identifier.otherPubMed: 32781951
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85089359965
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000561527000001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/20450
dc.descriptionFunding: J.H. is supported by a PhD scholarship funded by the School of Biology, University of St Andrews. A.G. is supported by a Natural Environment Research Council Independent Research Fellowship (grant no. NE/ K009524/1) and a European Research Council Consolidator grant (no. 771387).en
dc.description.abstractFemales and males may face different selection pressures. Accordingly, alleles that confer a benefit for one sex often incur a cost for the other. Classic evolutionary theory holds that the X chromosome, whose sex-biased transmission sees it spending more time in females, should value females more than males, whereas autosomes, whose transmission is unbiased, should value both sexes equally. However, recent mathematical and empirical studies indicate that male-beneficial alleles may be more favoured by the X chromosome than by autosomes. Here we develop a gene's-eye-view approach that reconciles the classic view with these recent discordant results, by separating a gene's valuation of female versus male fitness from its ability to induce fitness effects in either sex. We use this framework to generate new comparative predictions for sexually antagonistic evolution in relation to dosage compensation, sex-specific mortality and assortative mating, revealing how molecular mechanisms, ecology and demography drive variation in masculinization versus feminization across the genome.
dc.format.extent9
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciencesen
dc.rightsCopyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.en
dc.subjectAge structureen
dc.subjectAssortative matingen
dc.subjectDosage compensationen
dc.subjectIntragenomic conflicten
dc.subjectSexual antagonismen
dc.subjectSex chromosomeen
dc.subjectInclusive fitnessen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectQH426 Geneticsen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.subject.lccQH426en
dc.titleA gene’s-eye view of sexual antagonismen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Centre for Biological Diversityen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1633
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record