Dung fungi as an indicator of large herbivore dynamics in peatlands
MetadataShow full item record
Coprophilous fungal spores (CFS) have gained prominence in paleoecology as a proxy for large herbivore dynamics. Dung availability is one of several factors that influences spore abundance so it is unclear how closely CFS levels track herbivore biomass. This uncertainty is particularly relevant in peat- and moorland, where grazing impacts are a recurring topic in paleoecology and source of tension in environmental management, and where the method has yet to be tested. The current study used three ecological and conservation grazingexperiments in UK peat- and moorland to study modern and recent historic relationships between grazing treatment and the abundance of three key CFS types and three pollen disturbance indicators. A total of 78 surface samples and 2 short peat cores were analyzed. Dispersal distances are estimated to range from < 10m to tens of meters, based on significantly lower CFS abundance in exclosed than grazed plots at two sites, and similar CFS trends over the last century in short peats cores located 80m apart at the third site. The CFS signal thus represents activity in the surrounding landscape, despite predominantly local dispersal. CFS abundance does not correspond with animal biomass when compared across the three sites, however, and pollen disturbance indicators in the peat cores matched recent historic grazing records more consistently than CFS abundance. Potential reasons for these mismatches are discussed. Quantitative inferences about large herbivore abundance from CFS in peatlands should therefore be made with caution and recommendations are madefor further testing of the method.
Davies , A L 2019 , ' Dung fungi as an indicator of large herbivore dynamics in peatlands ' , Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology , vol. 271 , 104108 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2019.104108
Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2019.104108
DescriptionThis study was supported by the Ecological Continuity Trust and the Quaternary Research Association.
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.