A mixed methods comparative evaluation of a low cost otoscope (Arclight) with a traditional device in twenty-one clinicians
MetadataShow full item record
According to the World Health Organisation estimate, the global burden of illness from chronic ear infection affects about 4% of the world population (up to 330 million) with ear discharge and 60% of whom (up to 200 million) suffer from significant hearing impairment.1 Alarmingly, over 90% of the burden of chronic ear infections is borne by low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs).
Hey , S Y , Buckley , J C , Shahsavari , S , Kousha , O , Haddow , K A , Blaikie , A & Walker , F D L 2019 , ' A mixed methods comparative evaluation of a low cost otoscope (Arclight) with a traditional device in twenty-one clinicians ' , Clinical Otolaryngology , vol. Early View . https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13403
© 2019, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher's policies. This is the author created accepted version manuscript following peer review and as such may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13403
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.