Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorOkafor-Yarwood, Ife
dc.contributor.authorKadagi, Nelly I.
dc.contributor.authorMiranda, Nelson
dc.contributor.authorUku, Jacqueline
dc.contributor.authorElegbede, Isa O.
dc.contributor.authorAdewumi, Ibukun J.
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-23T08:30:01Z
dc.date.available2020-07-23T08:30:01Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-23
dc.identifier268895798
dc.identifier7dc0d58a-7cc1-42f6-8ff7-d182fe1778da
dc.identifier000552273000001
dc.identifier85089355066
dc.identifier.citationOkafor-Yarwood , I , Kadagi , N I , Miranda , N , Uku , J , Elegbede , I O & Adewumi , I J 2020 , ' The blue economy - cultural livelihood - ecosystem conservation triangle : the African experience ' , Frontiers in Marine Science , vol. 7 , 586 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00586en
dc.identifier.issn2296-7745
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-4952-9979/work/77893924
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/20315
dc.descriptionPublications costs were supported by the University of St Andrews to IO-Y and the New England Aquarium-Marine Conservation and Action Fund (MCAF) to NK.en
dc.description.abstractThe concept of Blue Economy (BE) is recognised as central for sustainable development that incorporates socio-economic benefits and ecological conservation. However, in Africa, much of the emphasis on BE is placed on economic gains; as a result, traditional livelihoods and small-scale local operations are outcompeted by international corporations and government initiatives, with little or no regard for social inclusion and environmental sustainability. We argue that successful BE initiatives in Africa accentuate the involvement of local communities and promote sustenance of the natural ecosystem. We define success in terms of the sustainability balance among ecological, social and economic aspects. Drawing on extensive expert experiences, observational data and literature review of case studies across the African continent, we highlight two critical findings. First, large scale BE initiatives prioritise economic gains at the expense of environmental degradation and the exclusion of local communities. Second, using the full spectrum sustainability (FSS) evaluation, we show that successful BE interventions considered ecological, economic, socio-cultural and institutional objectives. Drawing on these case studies, we propose the adoption of a collaborative framework which amalgamates the top-down and bottom-up approaches to BE management. Achieving the goal of successful blue growth in Africa is now even more challenged by the implications of COVID-19 on the BE sectors. Reimagining and rebuilding a resilient BE in Africa post-coronavirus will require a strong political commitment to promoting a balance between economic, social and environmental benefits in line with the African Union's Agenda 2063 and the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals.
dc.format.extent18
dc.format.extent1390280
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Marine Scienceen
dc.subjectAgenda 2063en
dc.subjectEcosystem preservationen
dc.subjectOcean economyen
dc.subjectCollaborative blue managementen
dc.subjectSocial equityen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectG Geography (General)en
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.subject.lccG1en
dc.titleThe blue economy - cultural livelihood - ecosystem conservation triangle : the African experienceen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Geographies of Sustainability, Society, Inequalities and Possibilitiesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Geography & Sustainable Developmenten
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fmars.2020.00586
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record