A review of factors to consider when using camera traps to study animal behavior to inform wildlife ecology and conservation
MetadataShow full item record
Camera traps (CTs) are an increasingly popular method of studying animal behavior. However, the impact of cameras on detected individuals—such as from mechanical noise, odor, and emitted light—has received relatively little attention. These impacts are particularly important in behavioral studies in conservation that seek to ascribe changes in behavior to relevant environmental factors. In this article, we discuss three sources of bias that are relevant to conservation behavior studies using CTs: (a) disturbance caused by cameras; (b) variation in animal‐detection parameters across camera models; and (c) biased detection across individuals and age, sex, and behavioral classes. We propose several recommendations aimed at mitigating responses to CTs by wildlife. Our recommendations offer a platform for the development of more rigorous and robust behavioral studies using CT technology and, if adopted, would result in greater applied benefits for conservation and management.
Caravaggi , A , Burton , A C , Clark , D A , Fisher , J T , Grass , A , Green , S , Hobaiter , C , Hofmeester , T R , Kalan , A K , Rabaiotti , D & Rivet , D 2020 , ' A review of factors to consider when using camera traps to study animal behavior to inform wildlife ecology and conservation ' , Conservation Science and Practice , vol. Early View , e239 . https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.239
Conservation Science and Practice
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Conservation Science and Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.