Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBandini, Elisa
dc.contributor.authorMotes-Rodrigo, Alba
dc.contributor.authorSteele, Matthew Paul
dc.contributor.authorRutz, Christian
dc.contributor.authorTennie, Claudio
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-18T12:30:02Z
dc.date.available2020-06-18T12:30:02Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-24
dc.identifier.citationBandini , E , Motes-Rodrigo , A , Steele , M P , Rutz , C & Tennie , C 2020 , ' Examining the mechanisms underlying the acquisition of animal tool behaviour ' , Biology Letters , vol. 16 , no. 6 , 20200122 . https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2020.0122en
dc.identifier.issn1744-9561
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 268364383
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: c70ede5a-ecd4-4048-a698-e7b7aa84c009
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-5187-7417/work/75248635
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000539301500003
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85085909924
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-1360-4762/work/80995376
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/20100
dc.descriptionFunding: The project STONECULT was funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 714658). E.B. and C.T. are supported by the Institutional Strategy of the University of Tübingen (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, ZUK 63). M.P.S.is supported by the University of St Andrews through a School of Biology Postgraduate Scholarship, and C.R. contributed to this piece while he was the grateful recipient of a Radcliffe Fellowship at the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard University.en
dc.description.abstractDespite major advances in the study of animal tool behaviour, researchers continue to debate how exactly certain behaviours are acquired. While specific mechanisms, such as genetic predispositions or action copying, are sometimes suspected to play a major role in behavioural acquisition, controlled experiments are required to provide conclusive evidence. In this opinion piece, we refer to classic ethological methodologies to emphasize the need for studying the relative contributions of different factors to the emergence of specific tool behaviours. We describe a methodology, consisting of a carefully staged series of baseline and social-learning conditions, that enables us to tease apart the roles of different mechanisms in the development of behavioural repertoires. Experiments employing our proposed methodology will not only advance our understanding of animal learning and culture, but as a result, will also help inform hypotheses about human cognitive, cultural and technological evolution. More generally, our conceptual framework is suitable for guiding the detailed investigation of other seemingly complex animal behaviours.
dc.format.extent6
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBiology Lettersen
dc.rightsCopyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.en
dc.subjectAnimal tool behaviouren
dc.subjectLearning mechanismen
dc.subjectBaseline experimenten
dc.subjectSocial learningen
dc.subjectTool useen
dc.subjectTool manufactureen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectT-DASen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleExamining the mechanisms underlying the acquisition of animal tool behaviouren
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Centre for Biological Diversityen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Centre for Social Learning & Cognitive Evolutionen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2020.0122
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record