Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorWhite, Sarah B.
dc.contributor.editorMcKitterick, Rosamond
dc.contributor.editorMethuen, Charlotte
dc.contributor.editorSpicer, Andrew
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-29T15:30:03Z
dc.date.available2020-05-29T15:30:03Z
dc.date.issued2020-06
dc.identifier.citationWhite , S B 2020 , The procedure and practice of witness testimony in English ecclesiastical courts, c.1193–1300 . in R McKitterick , C Methuen & A Spicer (eds) , The Church and the Law . vol. 56 , Studies in Church History , vol. 56 , Cambridge University Press , pp. 114-130 . https://doi.org/10.1017/stc.2019.7en
dc.identifier.issn0424-2084
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 259622512
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 3007ff8f-f73f-4922-9687-5fd19cce6f41
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-4230-7276/work/74873051
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85085387739
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/20012
dc.descriptionThe project CLCLCL has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No. 740611)en
dc.description.abstractIn the twelfth century, the English church courts made considerable use of compurgation and of sworn members of the community to aid in the resolution of disputes, but by the end of the thirteenth century, academic canon law depended almost entirely on witness testimony. Romano-canonical proceduralists established rules for examining witnesses, rejecting testimonies and resolving conflicts. However, these academic ideals were not always possible or even desirable in practice. Although Roman procedure required witnesses to be eyewitnesses, English ecclesiastical practice allowed witnesses to testify to public knowledge. Furthermore, individuals who were not qualified to testify did so regardless, and their testimonies were not excluded even following exceptions. This is not to say that standard procedure was not followed; more often than not, it was. However, these differences between theory and practice indicate that practitioners (and perhaps judges) in the English ecclesiastical courts were experimenting with ways to use witness testimony beyond the confines of the academic law.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherCambridge University Press
dc.relation.ispartofThe Church and the Lawen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudies in Church Historyen
dc.rightsCopyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 2020. This work has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies or with permission. Permission for further reuse of this content should be sought from the publisher or the rights holder. This is the author created accepted manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final https://doi.org/10.1017/stc.2019.7en
dc.subjectBR Christianityen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccBRen
dc.titleThe procedure and practice of witness testimony in English ecclesiastical courts, c.1193–1300en
dc.typeBook itemen
dc.contributor.sponsorEuropean Research Councilen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Institute of Legal and Constitutional Researchen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Historyen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/stc.2019.7
dc.date.embargoedUntil2020-05-15
dc.identifier.grantnumber740611en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record