Misperceptions of opposite-sex preferences for thinness and muscularity
MetadataShow full item record
Thin and muscular have been characterized as ideals for women and men, respectively. Little research has investigated whether men and women have accurate perceptions of opposite‐sex preferences of thinness and muscularity. Further, no study has explored whether opposite‐sex perceptions of thinness and muscularity preferences differ for short‐term and long‐term relationships. The present study set out to address these questions. We used interactive 3D human models to represent bodies varying in size (body mass index/BMI weight scaled by height) and body composition. University‐aged (18–31) White European heterosexual men and women were asked to choose their own and ideal body shape, the ideal body shape for a short‐ and a long‐term partner, and the body shape they thought the opposite‐sex would most like for short‐ and long‐term partners. Women overestimated the thinness that men prefer in a partner and men overestimated the heaviness and muscularity that women prefer in a partner. These misperceptions were more exaggerated for short‐term relationships than for long‐term relationships. The results illustrate the importance of investigating misperceptions of opposite‐sex preferences and raise the possibility that correcting misperceptions might have utility in reducing body dissatisfaction or eating disorders.
Perrett , D I & Lei , X 2021 , ' Misperceptions of opposite-sex preferences for thinness and muscularity ' , British Journal of Psychology , vol. 112 , no. 1 , pp. 247-264 . https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12451
British Journal of Psychology
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. British Journal of Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
DescriptionThe data that support the findings of this study will be openly available in Mendeley Data at http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/769zgnsm9w.1 following an embargo from 2020-08-09.
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.