Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorCevik, M.
dc.contributor.authorOng, D. S. Y.
dc.contributor.authorMackenzie, G.
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-15T23:34:15Z
dc.date.available2020-05-15T23:34:15Z
dc.date.issued2019-12
dc.identifier259006537
dc.identifiera56ec018-13a3-4374-ba4e-a67dd6f697c3
dc.identifier31102781
dc.identifier85067244577
dc.identifier000499092200022
dc.identifier.citationCevik , M , Ong , D S Y & Mackenzie , G 2019 , ' How scientists and physicians use Twitter during a medical congress ' , Clinical Microbiology and Infection , vol. 25 , no. 12 , pp. 1561.e7-1561.e12 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2019.04.030en
dc.identifier.issn1198-743X
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-1133-3874/work/60196679
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/19953
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: During medical congresses Twitter allows discussions to disseminate beyond the congress hall and reach a wider audience. Insights into the dynamics of social media interactions during congresses, dissemination of scientific information and the determinants of a successful tweet may allow us to better understand social media's role in science communication. METHODS: We retrospectively extracted social media data during the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID) 2017 and 2018 using NodeXL. We compared social media activity during these two congresses. Subsequently, we conducted in-depth analyses to identify the components of a successful tweet and multivariable analysis to assess independent factors associated with retweet activity. RESULTS: In 2018, approximately 13,000 delegates attended ECCMID, but only 591 Twitter accounts actively tweeted about the congress. Although fewer tweets were posted in 2018 compared to 2017 (4,213 vs 4,657, respectively), ECCMID2018 generated a 63% increase in the total number of retweets (p <0.001). According to multivariable logistic regression analysis, using multimedia, URL or hashtags and mentioning other Twitter account(s) were independently associated with retweet success. Mentioning of other users and use of multimedia were the only consistent predictors of retweets irrespective of the number of followers. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial increase in retweet activity and a modest increase in the number of influential Twitter accounts were observed between two successive congresses. Dissemination of scientific messages is more successful when connected accounts are actively involved in social media activity, and social media posts constitute the right combination of components.
dc.format.extent387358
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Microbiology and Infectionen
dc.subjectMedical conferenceen
dc.subjectMedTwitteren
dc.subjectScience communicationen
dc.subjectSocial mediaen
dc.subjectTwitteren
dc.subjectH Social Sciences (General)en
dc.subjectR Medicine (General)en
dc.subject3rd-DASen
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingen
dc.subject.lccH1en
dc.subject.lccR1en
dc.titleHow scientists and physicians use Twitter during a medical congressen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cmi.2019.04.030
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2020-05-16


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record