Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorDuguid, Shona
dc.contributor.authorMelis, Alicia
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-28T08:30:03Z
dc.date.available2020-04-28T08:30:03Z
dc.date.issued2020-09
dc.identifier.citationDuguid , S & Melis , A 2020 , ' How animals collaborate : underlying proximate mechanisms ' , Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science , vol. 11 , no. 5 , e1529 . https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1529en
dc.identifier.issn1939-5078
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 267432558
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 3a18a0b9-132c-4cb5-83ca-fa404e9836af
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85084158851
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000528789700001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/19861
dc.descriptionFunding: Templeton World Charity Foundation (Grant Number(s): TWCF0264).en
dc.description.abstractCollaboration or social interactions in which two or more individuals coordinate their behavior to produce outcomes from which both individuals benefit are common in nature. Individuals from many species hunt together, defend their territory, and form coalitions in intragroup competition. However, we still know very little about the proximate mechanisms underlying these behaviors. Recent theories of human cognitive evolution have emphasized the role collaboration may have played in the selection of socio‐cognitive skills. It has been argued that the capacity to form shared goals and joint intentions with others, is what allows humans to collaborate so flexibly and efficiently. Although there is no evidence that nonhuman animals are capable of shared intentionality, there is conceivably a wide range of proximate mechanisms that support forms of, potentially flexible, collaboration in other species. We review the experimental literature with the aim of evaluating what we know about how other species achieve collaboration; with a particular focus on chimpanzees. We structure the review with a new categorization of collaborative behavior that focuses on whether individuals intentionally coordinate actions with others. We conclude that for a wider comparative perspective we need more data from other species but the findings so far suggest that chimpanzees, and possibly other great apes, are capable of understanding the causal role of a partner in collaboration.
dc.format.extent18
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Scienceen
dc.rightsCopyright © 2020 The Authors. WIREs Cognitive Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en
dc.subjectApesen
dc.subjectCollaborationen
dc.subjectComparative psychologyen
dc.subjectCooperationen
dc.subjectSocial cognitionen
dc.subjectBF Psychologyen
dc.subject.lccBFen
dc.titleHow animals collaborate : underlying proximate mechanismsen
dc.typeJournal itemen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1529
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record