Files in this item
We are probably not Sims
Item metadata
dc.contributor.author | Mitchell, John B. O. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-13T14:30:01Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-04-13T14:30:01Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-04 | |
dc.identifier | 260558863 | |
dc.identifier | 34713a26-2cc4-49ac-aa8c-61cb6dad26ba | |
dc.identifier.citation | Mitchell , J B O 2020 , ' We are probably not Sims ' , Science and Christian Belief , vol. 32 , no. 1 , pp. 45-62 . < https://www.scienceandchristianbelief.org/view_abstract.php?ID=1470 > | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0954-4194 | |
dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0002-0379-6097/work/72360187 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10023/19794 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this article, I discuss the current state of the debate around the simulation hypothesis, the idea that the world we inhabit is a computer simulation in or within another universe. Considering recent work from a range of authors, I suggest that statistical arguments in favour of a simulated world are naive and fail to account either for Ockham’s Razor or for alternative existential possibilities besides base reality and a simulation. Most significantly, I observe that it would be computationally impossible in our own universe to simulate a similar cosmos at fine granularity. This implies substantial differences in size and information content between simulating and simulated universes. I argue that this makes serious analysis of the simulation argument extremely difficult. I suggest that Christian theology has no reason to reinvent itself to accommodate simulism; the two should be viewed as mutually exclusive world-views. Further, I note that the existence of a human soul or spirit, or indeed any non-reductionist explanation of human consciousness, could undermine the assumption of substrate independence that simulism requires. | |
dc.format.extent | 399211 | |
dc.format.extent | 412802 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Science and Christian Belief | en |
dc.subject | Simulation hypothesis | en |
dc.subject | Limits of computation | en |
dc.subject | Information | en |
dc.subject | Occam's razor | en |
dc.subject | Substrate independence | en |
dc.subject | Soul | en |
dc.subject | Spirit | en |
dc.subject | Consciousness | en |
dc.subject | QA76 Computer software | en |
dc.subject | QD Chemistry | en |
dc.subject | T-NDAS | en |
dc.subject.lcc | QA76 | en |
dc.subject.lcc | QD | en |
dc.title | We are probably not Sims | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. EaSTCHEM | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Biomedical Sciences Research Complex | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. School of Chemistry | en |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
dc.date.embargoedUntil | 2021-04-13 | |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.scienceandchristianbelief.org/view_abstract.php?ID=1470 | en |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.