Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorHinnebusch, Raymond
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-05T23:31:52Z
dc.date.available2020-04-05T23:31:52Z
dc.date.issued2018-04-06
dc.identifier.citationHinnebusch , R 2018 , ' Understanding regime divergence in the post-Uprising Arab states ' , Journal of Historical Sociology , vol. 31 , no. 1 , pp. 39-52 . https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12190en
dc.identifier.issn0952-1909
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 252197245
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 1c51b533-81a5-47bf-84d4-4e293cea4318
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85045320302
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-5800-6606/work/60630151
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000429562500014
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/19756
dc.description.abstractDespite the fact that democracy was a main demand of the protestors who spearheaded the Arab uprisings, five years later only Tunisia qualifies as democratic while elsewhere the outcomes have been either authoritarian restoration or failing states. This paper seeks to understand these three divergent trajectories in the post-Uprising Arab states, with Tunisia, Egypt and Syria taken as representative of each.
dc.format.extent14
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Historical Sociologyen
dc.rights© 2018, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created accepted version manuscript following peer review and as such may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12190en
dc.subjectArab Uprisingen
dc.subjectHistorical Sociologyen
dc.subjectDemocratisationen
dc.subjectAuthoritarianismen
dc.subjectFailed statesen
dc.subjectJZ International relationsen
dc.subjectSocial Sciences(all)en
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccJZen
dc.titleUnderstanding regime divergence in the post-Uprising Arab statesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of International Relationsen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12190
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record