Acetyl coenzyme A analogues as rationally designed inhibitors of citrate synthase
MetadataShow full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Altmetrics DOI Statistics
In this study, we probed the inhibition of pig heart citrate synthase (E.C. 184.108.40.206) by synthesising seven analogues either designed to mimic the proposed enolate intermediate in this enzyme reaction or developed from historical inhibitors. The most potent inhibitor was fluorovinyl thioether 9 (Ki=4.3 μm), in which a fluorine replaces the oxygen atom of the enolate. A comparison of the potency of 9 with that of its non‐fluorinated vinyl thioether analogue 10 (Ki=68.3 μm) revealed a clear “fluorine effect” favouring 9 by an order of magnitude. The dethia analogues of 9 and 10 proved to be poor inhibitors. A methyl sulfoxide analogue was a moderate inhibitor (Ki=11.1 μm), thus suggesting hydrogen bonding interactions in the enolate site. Finally, E and Z propenoate thioether isomers were explored as conformationally constrained carboxylates, but these were not inhibitors. All compounds were prepared by the synthesis of the appropriate pantetheinyl diol and then assembly of the coenzyme A structure according to a three‐enzyme biotransformation protocol. A quantum mechanical study, modelling both inhibitors 9 and 10 into the active site indicated short CF ⋅⋅⋅ H contacts of ≈2.0 Å, consistent with fluorine making two stabilising hydrogen bonds, and mimicking an enolate rather than an enol intermediate. Computation also indicated that binding of 9 to citrate synthase increases the basicity of a key aspartic acid carboxylate, which becomes protonated.
Bello , D , Rubanu , M G , Bandaranayaka , N , Götze , J P , Bühl , M & O'Hagan , D 2019 , ' Acetyl coenzyme A analogues as rationally designed inhibitors of citrate synthase ' , ChemBioChem , vol. 20 , no. 9 , pp. 1174-1182 . https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201800700
Copyright © 2019 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201800700
DescriptionAuthors thank the EPSRC (Grant EP/N03001X/1) for financial support.
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.