Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorWallace, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorKulu, Hill
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-22T00:32:39Z
dc.date.available2020-03-22T00:32:39Z
dc.date.issued2018-03-22
dc.identifier.citationWallace , M & Kulu , H 2018 , ' Can the salmon bias effect explain the migrant mortality advantage in England and Wales? ' , Population, Space and Place , vol. Early View , e2146 . https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2146en
dc.identifier.issn1544-8444
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 252614621
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 15e99e58-6ed4-46a8-a197-20e5162cd879
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85044212695
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000450332000011
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-8808-0719/work/75997002
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/19691
dc.descriptionThis research was possible through funding by the Economic and Social Research Council (ES/J500094/1; “Mortality among Immigrants and their Descendants in England and Wales”) and North West Doctoral Training Centre.en
dc.description.abstractDespite researchers regularly observing a migrant mortality advantage in high‐income destination countries, it remains unclear whether empirically observed low mortality among foreign‐born relative to natives is genuine or a result of censoring and selection biases inherent in the remigration of foreign‐born individuals. Our aim is to determine whether the main mode of selection bias, the “salmon bias effect” (remigration triggered by poor health), can account for this low foreign‐born mortality. We use the largest longitudinal resource in the United Kingdom, the Office for National Statistics Longitudinal Study, to fit discrete‐time survival models and observe which foreign‐born populations experience a migrant mortality advantage and/or salmon bias effect. For foreign‐born groups in which we observe both, we correct their mortality (using an indirect method) to see if the salmon bias can explain the observed mortality advantage. Importantly, we demonstrate that for many foreign‐born groups a mortality advantage exists in the absence of the salmon bias effect. Furthermore, in cases which we observe a mortality advantage and salmon bias (males and females from India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, and the Caribbean), the latter cannot sufficiently “explain away” the former. Taken together with previous findings on censoring bias in the United Kingdom and the wider international literature on censoring and selection biases, it becomes clear that remigration biases alone cannot sufficiently explain the migrant mortality advantage.
dc.format.extent18
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPopulation, Space and Placeen
dc.rightsCopyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2146en
dc.subjectHealthy migrant effecten
dc.subjectLongitudinal studyen
dc.subjectMigrant mortality advantageen
dc.subjectRemigrationen
dc.subjectSalmon bias effecten
dc.subjectSurvival analysisen
dc.subjectG Geography (General)en
dc.subject3rd-DASen
dc.subject.lccG1en
dc.titleCan the salmon bias effect explain the migrant mortality advantage in England and Wales?en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Geography & Sustainable Developmenten
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2146
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2020-03-22


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record