Show simple item record

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorTorchin, Leshu
dc.contributor.authorPal, Shorna
dc.coverage.spatial[11], 279 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-06T12:11:57Z
dc.date.available2020-03-06T12:11:57Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-22
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/19608
dc.description.abstractMy thesis identifies and establishes the Multiplex Film as a widespread paradigm in contemporary Indian Cinema, by critically examining its emergence from the post-millennium collapse of All-India and Alternative films, often referred to as Indian “art” and “commercial” films, previously well-established and seemingly distinct categories that have historically defined and characterised Indian cinema. I assert that reading pre-millennium Indian films by applying the Rasa analytical method, reveals multiple meeting points between All-India and Alternative Films, which have been obfuscated through a historic misconstruction and mislabelling of these film types; I contend that this interconnectedness expedites their convergence into the Multiplex Film. By tracing the contemporary phenomenon as a product of the Indian government’s economic liberalisation and globalisation policies, and the resultant corporatisation and transnationalism within the 21st century film industries in Mumbai and in other regional filmmaking centres, I present a way of studying Multiplex Films both as Indian Cinema as well as Transnational Cinema, while also contributing to the limited scholarship on the contemporary Indian film industries. My use of rasa in conjunction with generic dramatic principles detailed in the Natyasastra, an ancient Indian treatise on dramaturgy, offers a new Rasa framework that can be used to read any national cinema, as it functions independently of rasa as an aesthetic. Through a series of forty-five interviews across seven cities with personnel from the Hindi, Bengali, Tamil, Telegu, Marathi and Assamese film industries, including writers, directors, actors, producers, cinematographers, editors, sound designers, distributors, exhibitors, alongside spectator focus groups in metropolitan and smaller cities, in addition to close textual analysis of a range of Indian films, existing scholarship, official government and film industry reports, I re-examine assumptions about Indian film history and show how the earlier two film types are metamorphosed through contemporary socioeconomic, political and industrial shifts into the Multiplex Film.en_US
dc.description.sponsorship"This work was supported by the School of Philosophical, Anthropological and Film Studies of the University of St Andrews (Postgraduate Research Scholarship) and the Russell Trust Postgraduate Award" -- Fundingen
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.subjectMultiplex filmen_US
dc.subjectIndian cinemaen_US
dc.subjectRasa theoryen_US
dc.subjectNatyasastraen_US
dc.subjectBollywooden_US
dc.subjectIndian film Industriesen_US
dc.subjectHindi filmsen_US
dc.subjectTransnational cinemaen_US
dc.subjectIndian film historyen_US
dc.subject.lccPN1993.5I8P26en
dc.subject.lcshMotion picture industry--Indiaen
dc.subject.lcshMotion pictures--Indiaen
dc.subject.lcshMultiplex theaters--Indiaen
dc.subject.lcshRasasen
dc.subject.lcshIndia--Economic conditionsen
dc.subject.lcshIndia--Social life and customsen
dc.titleThe monsoon crush : rethinking Indian cinema's art-commerce divide in the context of transnationalism, corporatisation and liberalisationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrews. School of Philosophical, Anthropological and Film Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorRussell Trust. Postgraduate Awarden_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2025-02-27
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Print and electronic copy restricted until 27th February 2025en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/10023-19608


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record