Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorGaut, Berys Nigel
dc.contributor.authorUrsell, James
dc.coverage.spatial176 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-20T14:28:16Z
dc.date.available2020-02-20T14:28:16Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-22
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/19508
dc.description.abstractThe primary aim of this thesis is to formulate an intensional definition of aesthetic experience. Its secondary aims are (i) to show how this definition might be used for empirical research and (ii) to better understand other terms that are qualified by ‘aesthetic’ (chiefly, ‘aesthetic properties’ and ‘aesthetic value’). In chapter one, I will explain the nature of the problem we face and why it demands our attention. In chapters two and three, I will critically survey positions in the literature and argue that none adequately characterise aesthetic experience. In chapter four, I will motivate and defend an intensional definition of ‘aesthetic experience’ and an art-based account of ‘aesthetic properties’. The former states, put briefly, that aesthetic experiences are those which acquire a valence when the subject attends to the content of her experience for its own sake and discerns aesthetic properties. The latter states that ‘aesthetic properties’ are those which comprise the value artworks have as works of art. In chapter five, I will use this definition of aesthetic experience to formulate the hypothesis that mindfulness training can augment one’s propensity for having rewarding aesthetic experiences of nature and everyday life. I will then propose how this hypothesis could be empirically investigated. In chapter six, I conclude by examining what my analysis of ‘aesthetic experience’ and ‘aesthetic properties’ reveals about ‘aesthetic value’. I will then, finally, highlight topics requiring further research.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAestheticsen_US
dc.subjectAesthetic experienceen_US
dc.subjectAesthetic propertiesen_US
dc.subjectAesthetic valueen_US
dc.subjectMindfulnessen_US
dc.subjectMeta-aestheticsen_US
dc.subjectNoël Carrollen_US
dc.subjectRobert Steckeren_US
dc.subjectGary Isemingeren_US
dc.subjectJerrold Levinsonen_US
dc.subjectClive Bellen_US
dc.subjectMonroe Beardsleyen_US
dc.subjectEdward Bulloughen_US
dc.subjectJerome Stolnitzen_US
dc.subjectBence Nanayen_US
dc.subjectWell-beingen_US
dc.subject.lccBH39.U8
dc.subject.lcshAestheticsen
dc.subject.lcshMindfulness (Psychology)en
dc.titleThe anatomy of aesthetic experienceen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrews. School of Philosophical, Anthropological and Film Studiesen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/10023-19508


The following licence files are associated with this item:

    This item appears in the following Collection(s)

    Show simple item record

    Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
    Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's licence for re-use is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International