Show simple item record

Files in this item


Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorScharp, Kevin
dc.identifier.citationScharp , K 2018 , ' Shrieking in the face of vengeance ' , Analysis , vol. 78 , no. 3 , anx163 , pp. 454-463 .
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 252071293
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: c4685efd-74c7-40b5-b4f0-64ed09bbd5ab
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85055276145
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000440976400009
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-3900-4087/work/69029521
dc.description.abstractParaconsistent dialetheism is the view that some contradictions are true and that the inference rule ex falso quod libet (a.k.a. explosion) is invalid. A long-standing problem for paraconsistent dialetheism is that it has difficulty making sense of situations where people use locutions like ‘just true’ and ‘just false’. Jc Beall recently advocated a general strategy, which he terms shrieking, for solving this problem and thereby strengthening the case for paraconsistent dialetheism. However, Beall’s strategy fails, and seeing why it fails brings into greater focus just how daunting the just-true problem is for the dialetheist.
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Analysis Trust. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at
dc.subjectLiar paradoxen
dc.subjectRevenge paradoxen
dc.subjectShriek ruleen
dc.subjectB Philosophy (General)en
dc.titleShrieking in the face of vengeanceen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Philosophyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. St Andrews Centre for Exoplanet Scienceen
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record