Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorElcheroth, Guy
dc.contributor.authorPenic, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorUsoof, Ramila
dc.contributor.authorReicher, Steve
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-14T13:30:04Z
dc.date.available2020-01-14T13:30:04Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-18
dc.identifier.citationElcheroth , G , Penic , S , Usoof , R & Reicher , S 2019 , ' Multiple perspectives in conflict settings : an introduction ' , Journal of Social and Political Psychology , vol. 7 , no. 2 , pp. 913-924 . https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v7i2.1333en
dc.identifier.issn2195-3325
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 265730441
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 8d8d1825-c5d3-4e88-9cdf-d56cc9cc83ff
dc.identifier.otherBibtex: JSPP1333
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85077204772
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/19276
dc.descriptionThe drafting of this paper, the editing of the special thematic session, and the research programme that provided a key impetus for both, were financially supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (r4d – Swiss Programme for Research on Global Issues for Development, Pluralistic Memories Project, SNSF grant numbers: 400240_146955 / 400240_171188).en
dc.description.abstractIn this introduction to the special thematic section, we discuss the pre-eminent research orientation in the social and political psychology of peace and conflict, its current critiques, and what more multiple perspectives can add to the field. First, we outline key characteristics of the ‘simple road’ to conflict settings: a simple, often binary, definition of the sides involved, a focus on one conflict-induced negative outcome and on one causal pathway leading to it, and a motivation to derive policy recommendations from empirical findings. Second, we discuss constructivist, normative, ecological, and pragmatic critiques of the ‘simple road’, as four distinct strands grounded in different epistemological assumptions, but converging on the account that research priorities need to be revised and methodologies be expanded. Third, engaging with the fundamental questions raised by the critiques, we make a plea for more multiple perspectives: for multiple voices among research participants (more diversified samples), for multiple positions from where to listen to these voices (more time-points and multi-factorial approaches), and for multiple sensors with which to capture them (more mixed methods). We highlight how the different contributions to the section provide creative developments along one or several of the three axes. On the basis of the concrete inspiring examples they provide, we argue that a field growing along these axes would increase its capacity to bridge its most important critical developments and to expand its scope in relevant directions.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Social and Political Psychologyen
dc.rightsCopyright © 2019 The Authors. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en
dc.subjectPeace and conflict studiesen
dc.subjectParsimonious research designsen
dc.subjectComplexityen
dc.subjectMultiple perspectivesen
dc.subjectDiversified samplesen
dc.subjectHolistic approachesen
dc.subjectMixed methodsen
dc.subjectBF Psychologyen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccBFen
dc.titleMultiple perspectives in conflict settings : an introductionen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Centre for Research into Equality, Diversity & Inclusionen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.St Andrews Sustainability Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v7i2.1333
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record