Line transect sampling of primates : can animal-to-observer distance methods work?
MetadataShow full item record
Line transect sampling is widely used for estimating abundance of primate populations. Animal-to-observer distances (AODs) are commonly used in analysis, in preference to perpendicular distances from the line. This is in marked contrast with standard practice for other applications of line transect sampling. We formalize the mathematical shortcomings of approaches based on AODs, and show that they are likely to give strongly biased estimates of density. We review papers that claim good performance for the method, and explore this performance through simulations. These confirm strong bias in estimates of density using AODs. We conclude that AOD methods are conceptually flawed, and that they cannot in general provide valid estimates of density.
Buckland , S T , Plumptre , A J , Thomas , L & Rexstad , E 2010 , ' Line transect sampling of primates : can animal-to-observer distance methods work? ' International Journal of Primatology , vol. 31 , no. 3 , pp. 485-499 . DOI: 10.1007/s10764-010-9408-4
International Journal of Primatology
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010. This is an author version of the article. The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com
DescriptionAn erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10764-010-9469-4
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.