Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorEbel, Sonja J.
dc.contributor.authorHanus, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorCall, Josep
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-09T00:37:50Z
dc.date.available2020-01-09T00:37:50Z
dc.date.issued2019-04
dc.identifier257381272
dc.identifiere958e8d8-8124-4458-9423-7cde8730d7f7
dc.identifier85059624210
dc.identifier000458469200006
dc.identifier.citationEbel , S J , Hanus , D & Call , J 2019 , ' How prior experience and task presentation modulate innovation in 6-year-old-children ' , Journal of Experimental Child Psychology , vol. 180 , pp. 87-103 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.12.004en
dc.identifier.issn0022-0965
dc.identifier.otherRIS: urn:8437190C8F9535A86B7864D56DD89FD5
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-8597-8336/work/52888778
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/19253
dc.descriptionThis research was funded by the Max Planck Society.en
dc.description.abstractLow innovation rates have been found with children until 6–8 years of age in tasks that required them to make a tool. Little is known about how prior experience and task presentation influence innovation rates. In the current study, we investigated these aspects in the floating peanut task (FPT), which required children to pour water into a vertical tube to retrieve a peanut. In three experiments, we varied the amount of plants that 6-year-olds (N = 256) watered prior to the task (zero, one, or five plants), who watered the plants (child or experimenter), and the distance and salience of the water source. We expected that prior experience with the water would modulate task performance by either boosting innovation rates (facilitation effect) or reducing them given that children would possibly learn that the water was for watering plants (functional fixedness effect). Our results indicate robustly low innovation rates in 6-year-olds. However, children’s performance improved to some extent with increased salience of the water source as well as with an experimenter-given hint. Due to the low innovation rates in this age group, we investigated whether watering plants prior to the FPT would influence innovation rates in 7- and 8-year-olds (N = 33), for which we did not find evidence. We conclude that 6-year-olds struggle with innovation but that they are more likely to innovate if crucial aspects of the task are made more salient. Thus, although 6-year-olds can innovate, they require more physical and social scaffolding than older children and adults.
dc.format.extent17
dc.format.extent1003414
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Experimental Child Psychologyen
dc.subjectCausal understandingen
dc.subjectFloating peanut tasken
dc.subjectFunctional fixednessen
dc.subjectInnovationen
dc.subjectPrimatesen
dc.subjectPrior experienceen
dc.subjectBF Psychologyen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subject.lccBFen
dc.titleHow prior experience and task presentation modulate innovation in 6-year-old-childrenen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Social Learning & Cognitive Evolutionen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jecp.2018.12.004
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2020-01-09


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record