Files in this item
Is experimental data quality the limiting factor in predicting the aqueous solubility of druglike molecules?
Item metadata
dc.contributor.author | Palmer, David S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mitchell, John B.O. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-12-09T09:30:04Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-12-09T09:30:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-08-04 | |
dc.identifier | 255684851 | |
dc.identifier | 72dd60aa-fae1-421f-849f-03f3e0c07060 | |
dc.identifier | 84905465361 | |
dc.identifier | 24919008 | |
dc.identifier | 000339982900046 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Palmer , D S & Mitchell , J B O 2014 , ' Is experimental data quality the limiting factor in predicting the aqueous solubility of druglike molecules? ' , Molecular Pharmaceutics , vol. 11 , no. 8 , pp. 2962-2972 . https://doi.org/10.1021/mp500103r | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1543-8384 | |
dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0002-0379-6097/work/56638648 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10023/19095 | |
dc.description | D.S.P. is grateful for funding from the European Commission through a Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship within the seventh European Community Framework Programme (FP7-PEOPLE-2010-IEF). D.S.P. thanks the University of Strathclyde for support through its Strategic Appointment and Investment Scheme. Computations were performed at the EPSRC funded ARCHIE-WeSt High Performance Computer (www.archie-west.ac.uk, EPSRC grant no. EP K0005861). J.B.O.M. thanks the Scottish Universities Life Sciences Alliance (SULSA) for financial support and EaStCHEM for access to the EaStCHEM Research Computing Facility. | en |
dc.description.abstract | We report the results of testing quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPR) that were trained upon the same druglike molecules but two different sets of solubility data: (i) data extracted from several different sources from the published literature, for which the experimental uncertainty is estimated to be 0.6-0.7 log S units (referred to mol/L); (ii) data measured by a single accurate experimental method (CheqSol), for which experimental uncertainty is typically <0.05 log S units. Contrary to what might be expected, the models derived from the CheqSol experimental data are not more accurate than those derived from the "noisy" literature data. The results suggest that, at the present time, it is the deficiency of QSPR methods (algorithms and/or descriptor sets), and not, as is commonly quoted, the uncertainty in the experimental measurements, which is the limiting factor in accurately predicting aqueous solubility for pharmaceutical molecules. | |
dc.format.extent | 11 | |
dc.format.extent | 604179 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Molecular Pharmaceutics | en |
dc.subject | Solubility | en |
dc.subject | Bioavailability | en |
dc.subject | QSPR | en |
dc.subject | QSAR | en |
dc.subject | Druglike | en |
dc.subject | ADME | en |
dc.subject | Random Forest | en |
dc.subject | Dissolution | en |
dc.subject | Experimental error | en |
dc.subject | CheqSol | en |
dc.subject | Noyes-Whitney | en |
dc.subject | Henderson-Hasselbalch | en |
dc.subject | Polymorph | en |
dc.subject | Crystal | en |
dc.subject | Machine learning | en |
dc.subject | General solubility equation | en |
dc.subject | ADMET | en |
dc.subject | Pharmaceutical | en |
dc.subject | Rule-of-five | en |
dc.subject | QD Chemistry | en |
dc.subject | RM Therapeutics. Pharmacology | en |
dc.subject | Molecular Medicine | en |
dc.subject | Pharmaceutical Science | en |
dc.subject | Drug Discovery | en |
dc.subject | DAS | en |
dc.subject | BDC | en |
dc.subject | R2C | en |
dc.subject.lcc | QD | en |
dc.subject.lcc | RM | en |
dc.title | Is experimental data quality the limiting factor in predicting the aqueous solubility of druglike molecules? | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. EaSTCHEM | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Biomedical Sciences Research Complex | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. School of Chemistry | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1021/mp500103r | |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.