Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorMarch, David
dc.contributor.authorBoehme, Lars
dc.contributor.authorTintoré, Joaquín
dc.contributor.authorVélez-Belchi, Pedro Joaquín
dc.contributor.authorGodley, Brendan J.
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-03T12:30:15Z
dc.date.available2019-12-03T12:30:15Z
dc.date.issued2019-11-27
dc.identifier262037491
dc.identifier36ba6e89-4f66-4f52-b723-d325c7624e1f
dc.identifier85075738170
dc.identifier000498773900001
dc.identifier.citationMarch , D , Boehme , L , Tintoré , J , Vélez-Belchi , P J & Godley , B J 2019 , ' Towards the integration of animal-borne instruments into global ocean observing systems ' , Global Change Biology , vol. Early View , pp. 1-11 . https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14902en
dc.identifier.issn1365-2486
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/19049
dc.descriptionFunding: BBVA Foundation (“Ayudas Fundación BBVA a Equipos de Investigación Científica 2016”) and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 794938; Spanish Government (grant “Juan de la Cierva-Formación” FJCI-2014-20064, grant “José Castillejo” CAS17/00193) (D.M.).en
dc.description.abstractMarine animals are increasingly instrumented with environmental sensors that provide large volumes of oceanographic data. Here, we conduct an innovative and comprehensive global analysis to determine the potential contribution of animal‐borne instruments (ABI) into ocean observing systems (OOSs) and provide a foundation to establish future integrated ocean monitoring programmes. We analyse the current gaps of the long‐term Argo observing system (>1.5 million profiles) and assess its spatial overlap with the distribution of marine animals across eight major species groups (tuna and billfishes, sharks and rays, marine turtles, pinnipeds, cetaceans, sirenians, flying seabirds and penguins). We combine distribution ranges of 183 species and satellite tracking observations from >3,000 animals. Our analyses identify potential areas where ABI could complement OOS. Specifically, ABI have the potential to fill gaps in marginal seas, upwelling areas, the upper 10 m of the water column, shelf regions and polewards of 60° latitude. Our approach provides the global baseline required to plan the integration of ABI into global and regional OOS while integrating conservation and ocean monitoring priorities.
dc.format.extent11
dc.format.extent1532705
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofGlobal Change Biologyen
dc.subjectAnimal-borne instrumentsen
dc.subjectArgoen
dc.subjectGlobal ocean observing systemen
dc.subjectMarine vertebratesen
dc.subjectMulti-platform ocean observationen
dc.subjectOperational oceanographyen
dc.subjectPinnipedsen
dc.subjectSatellite trackingen
dc.subjectSea turtlesen
dc.subjectGC Oceanographyen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subjectSDG 14 - Life Below Wateren
dc.subject.lccGCen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleTowards the integration of animal-borne instruments into global ocean observing systemsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Sea Mammal Research Uniten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotlanden
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14902
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record